Cited by 338SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmune responses and vaccinationsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection rescues B and T cell responses to variants after first vaccine dose

Open access
Reynolds, Catherine J., Pade, Corinna, Gibbons, Joseph M., Butler, David K., Otter, Ashley D., Menacho, Katia, Fontana, Marianna, Smit, Angelique +130 more·2021·Science

Abstract

A boost from infection: During clinical trials of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines, no one who had survived infection with the virus was tested. A year after the pandemic was declared, vaccination of previously infected persons is a reality. Reynolds et al. address the knowledge gap in a cohort of UK health care workers given the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in which half of the participants had experienced natural virus infections early in the pandemic (see the Perspective by Crotty). Genotyping indicated that a genetic component underlies heterogeneity in immune responses to vaccine and to natural infection. After vaccination, naïve individuals developed antibody responses similar to those seen in naturally infected persons, but T cell responses were more limited and sometimes absent. However, antibody and memory responses in individuals vaccinated after infection were substantially boosted to the extent that a single vaccine dose is likely to protect against the more aggressive B.1.1.7 variant. It is possible that the messenger RNA vaccine has an adjuvant effect, biasing responses toward antibody generation. Science , abh1282, this issue p. 1418 ; see also abj2258, p. 1392

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abh1282

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mRNA vaccines induced robust circulating antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and spike RBD, with distinct early response patterns in naïve and recovered individuals.

    “As reported previously by our group and others, mRNA vaccines induced robust circulating antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and spike RBD with distinct patterns of early response in SARS-CoV-2–naïve and –recovered individuals (Fig. 1B) (16, 34–36).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 338

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]Z. Wang, F. Schmidt, Y. Weisblum, F. Muecksch, C. O. Barnes, S. Finkin, D. Schaefer-Babajew, M. Cipolla, C. Gaebler, J. A. Lieberman, T. Y. Oliveira, Z. Yang, M. E. Abernathy, K. E. Huey-Tubman, A. Hurley, M. Turroja, K. A. West, K. Gordon, K. G. Millard, V. Ramos, J. Da Silva, J. Xu, R. A. Colbert, R. Patel, J. Dizon, C. Unson-O’Brien, I. Shimeliovich, A. Gazumyan, M. Caskey, P. J. Bjorkman, R. Casellas, T. Hatziioannou, P. D. Bieniasz, M. C. Nussenzweig, mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants. Nature 592, 616– 622 (2021). 10.1038/s41586-021-03324-6 33567448 PMC8503938 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [7]E. E. Walsh, R. W. Frenck Jr.., A. R. Falsey, N. Kitchin, J. Absalon, A. Gurtman, S. Lockhart, K. Neuzil, M. J. Mulligan, R. Bailey, K. A. Swanson, P. Li, K. Koury, W. Kalina, D. Cooper, C. Fontes-Garfias, P. Y. Shi, Ö. Türeci, K. R. Tompkins, K. E. Lyke, V. Raabe, P. R. Dormitzer, K. U. Jansen, U. Şahin, W. C. Gruber, Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2439– 2450 (2020). 10.1056/NEJMoa2027906 33053279 PMC7583697 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [15]X. Shen, H. Tang, C. McDanal, K. Wagh, W. Fischer, J. Theiler, H. Yoon, D. Li, B. F. Haynes, K. O. Sanders, S. Gnanakaran, N. Hengartner, R. Pajon, G. Smith, G. M. Glenn, B. Korber, D. C. Montefiori, SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 is susceptible to neutralizing antibodies elicited by ancestral spike vaccines. Cell Host Microbe 29, 529– 539.e3 (2021). 10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.002 33705729 PMC7934674 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Reynolds, C. J., Pade, C., Gibbons, J. M., Butler, D. K., Otter, A. D., Menacho, K., Fontana, M., Smit, A., Sackville-West, J. E., Cutino-Moguel, T., Maini, M. K., Chain, B., Noursadeghi, M., UK COVIDsortium Immune Correlates Network, Brooks, T., Semper, A., Manisty, C., Treibel, T. A., Moon, J. C., UK COVIDsortium Investigators, Valdes, A. M., McKnight, Á., Altmann, D. M., Boyton, R., Abbass, H., Abiodun, A., Alfarih, M., Alldis, Z., Altmann, D. M., Amin, O. E., Andiapen, M., Artico, J., Augusto, J. B., Baca, G. L., Bailey, S. N. L., Bhuva, A. N., Boulter, A., Bowles, R., Boyton, R. J., Bracken, O. V., O’Brien, B., Brooks, T., Bullock, N., Butler, D. K., Captur, G., Champion, N., Chan, C., Chandran, A., Collier, D., Couto de Sousa, J., Couto-Parada, X., Cutino-Moguel, T., Davies, R. H., Douglas, B., Di Genova, C., Dieobi-Anene, K., Diniz, M. O., Ellis, A., Feehan, K., Finlay, M., Fontana, M., Forooghi, N., Gaier, C., Gibbons, J. M., Gilroy, D., Hamblin, M., Harker, G., Hewson, J., Heywood, W., Hickling, L. M., Hingorani, A. D., Howes, L., Hughes, A., Hughes, G., Hughes, R., Itua, I., Jardim, V., Lee, W.-Y. J., Jensen, M., Jones, J., Jones, M., Joy, G., Kapil, V., Kurdi, H., Lambourne, J., Lin, K.-M., Louth, S., Maini, M. K., Mandadapu, V., Manisty, C., McKnight, Á., Menacho, K., Mfuko, C., Mills, K., Mitchelmore, O., Moon, C., Moon, J. C., Munoz-Sandoval, D., Murray, S. M., Noursadeghi, M., Otter, A., Pade, C., Palma, S., Parker, R., Patel, K., Pawarova, B., Petersen, S. E., Piniera, B., Pieper, F. P., Pope, D., Prossora, M., Rannigan, L., Rapala, A., Reynolds, C. J., Richards, A., Robathan, M., Rosenheim, J., Sambile, G., Schmidt, N. M., Semper, A., Seraphim, A., Simion, M., Smit, A., Sugimoto, M., Swadling, L., Taylor, S., Temperton, N., Thomas, S., Thornton, G. D., Treibel, T. A., Tucker, A., Veerapen, J., Vijayakumar, M., Welch, S., Wodehouse, T., Wynne, L., Zahedi, D., & Chain, B.
Affiliations
  • National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton Down, UK.
  • James Wigg Practice, Kentish Town, London, UK.
  • Harefield Hospital (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Science
Published
2021-06-25
Volume
372
Issue
6549
Pages
1418-1423
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3158748765
Cited by
338
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 1
FWCI
24.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome (214191/Z/18/Z, 207511/Z/17/Z)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Cancer Research UK (MR/S019553/1, MR/R02622X/1, MR/V036939/1, 2019SRC015, 860325, AA/18/6/34223, FS/19/35/34374, 207511/Z/17/Z, 214191/Z/18/Z, 26603, COV0331 MR/V027883/1)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • UCLH Biomedical Research Centre (FS/19/35/34374)
  • BHF (AA/18/6/34223)
  • Cystic Fibrosis Trust (2019SRC015)
  • EU HORIZON (860325)
  • UKRI (MR/S019553/1, MR/R02622X/1, MR/V036939/1, National Core Study: Immunity (NCSi4P))
  • Rosetrees Trust UK
  • CRUK (26603)
  • EU Horizon 2020 (860325)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, prior infection, BNT162b2, mRNA vaccines, single-dose vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 variants, Alpha variant, Beta variant, cross-protective immunity, T cell response, B cell response, neutralizing antibodies, memory B cells, HLA polymorphism, healthcare workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review