Cited by 153SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Vaccination with BNT162b2 reduces transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to household contacts in Israel

Open access
Prunas, Ottavia, Warren, Joshua L., Crawford, Forrest W., Gazit, Sivan, Patalon, Tal, Weinberger, Daniel M., Pitzer, Virginia E.·2022·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 on the individual level is well established. However, few studies have examined vaccine effectiveness against transmission. We used a chain binomial model to estimate the effectiveness of vaccination with BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech messenger RNA (mRNA)-based vaccine] against household transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Israel before and after emergence of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. Vaccination reduced susceptibility to infection by 89.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.7 to 90.0%], whereas vaccine effectiveness against infectiousness given infection was 23.0% (95% CI: −11.3 to 46.7%) during days 10 to 90 after the second dose, before 1 June 2021. Total vaccine effectiveness was 91.8% (95% CI: 88.1 to 94.3%). However, vaccine effectiveness is reduced over time as a result of the combined effect of waning of immunity and emergence of the Delta variant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abl4292

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 153

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]V. Shah., Effect of vaccination on transmission of COVID-19: an observational study in healthcare workers and their households. medRxiv, 2021: p. 2021.03.11.21253275.
  2. [20]T. Patalon., Short Term Reduction in the Odds of Testing Positive for SARS-CoV-2; a Comparison Between Two Doses and Three doses of the BNT162b2 Vaccine. medRxiv, 2021.

Authors
Prunas, O., Warren, J. L., Crawford, F. W., Gazit, S., Patalon, T., Weinberger, D. M., & Pitzer, V. E.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Maccabi Healthcare Services (IL)
Corresponding author
Prunas, Ottavia
Venue
Science
Published
2022-03-11
Volume
375
Issue
6585
Pages
1151-1154
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4220836043
Cited by
153
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 15
FWCI
16.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI112970, R01AI137093)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP2HD091799)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
BNT162b2, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, household transmission, vaccine effectiveness, infectiousness, Delta variant, waning immunity, mRNA vaccines, Israel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review