Cited by 31Research, Science, and AcademiaLaw, AI, and Intellectual PropertyOpen Source Software Innovations

Considerations for governing open foundation models

Bommasani, Rishi, Kapoor, Sayash, Klyman, Kevin, Longpre, Shayne, Ramaswami, Ashwin, Zhang, Daniel, Schaake, Marietje, Ho, Daniel E. +2 more·2024·Science

Abstract

Different policy proposals may disproportionately affect the innovation ecosystem

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adp1848

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 5 · Cited by 31

Authors
Bommasani, R., Kapoor, S., Klyman, K., Longpre, S., Ramaswami, A., Zhang, D., Schaake, M., Ho, D. E., Narayanan, A., & Liang, P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2024-10-11
Volume
386
Issue
6718
Pages
151-153
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4403294432
Cited by
31
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4
FWCI
11.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
Keywords
large language models, AI governance, innovation ecosystems, AI policy, open-source AI
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Foundations, Public Policy, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review