Cited by 67Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Deep learning–guided design of dynamic proteins

Open access
Guo, Amy B., Akpinaroglu, Deniz, Stephens, Christina A., Grabe, Michael, Smith, Colin A., Kelly, Mark J. S., Kortemme, Tanja·2025·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Deep learning has advanced the design of static protein structures, but the controlled conformational changes that are hallmarks of natural signaling proteins have remained inaccessible to de novo design. Here, we describe a general deep learning–guided approach for de novo design of dynamic changes between intradomain geometries of proteins, similar to switch mechanisms prevalent in nature, with atomic-level precision. We solve four structures that validate the designed conformations, demonstrate modulation of the conformational landscape by orthosteric ligands and allosteric mutations, and show that physics-based simulations are in agreement with deep-learning predictions and experimental data. Our approach demonstrates that new modes of motion can now be realized through de novo design and provides a framework for constructing biology-inspired, tunable, and controllable protein signaling behavior de novo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adr7094

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 60 · Cited by 67

Authors
Guo, A. B., Akpinaroglu, D., Stephens, C. A., Grabe, M., Smith, C. A., Kelly, M. J. S., & Kortemme, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Wesleyan University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Guo, Amy B.
  • Kortemme, Tanja
Venue
Science
Published
2025-05-22
Volume
388
Issue
6749
Pages
eadr7094-eadr7094
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4410706171
Cited by
67
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 1
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (g-2021-16899)
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od023455-01a1)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM137109, R35GM145236)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
de novo protein design, switching mechanism, protein signaling, protein conformational landscape
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Allosteric Regulation, Ligands, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review