Cited by 434Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Longitudinal Change in CSF Biomarkers in Autosomal-Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Fagan, Anne M., Xiong, Chengjie, Jasielec, Mateusz S., Bateman, Randall J., Goate, Alison M., Benzinger, Tammie L. S., Ghetti, Bernardino, Martins, Ralph N. +14 more·2014·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Clinicopathological evidence suggests that the pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) begins many years before the appearance of cognitive symptoms. Biomarkers are required to identify affected individuals during this asymptomatic ("preclinical") stage to permit intervention with potential disease-modifying therapies designed to preserve normal brain function. Studies of families with autosomal-dominant AD (ADAD) mutations provide a unique and powerful means to investigate AD biomarker changes during the asymptomatic period. In this biomarker study, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma, and in vivo amyloid imaging cross-sectional data at baseline in individuals from ADAD families enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network. Our study revealed reduced concentrations of CSF amyloid-β1-42 (Aβ1-42) associated with the presence of Aβ plaques, and elevated concentrations of CSF tau, ptau181 (phosphorylated tau181), and VILIP-1 (visinin-like protein-1), markers of neurofibrillary tangles and neuronal injury/death, in asymptomatic mutation carriers 10 to 20 years before their estimated age at symptom onset (EAO) and before the detection of cognitive deficits. When compared longitudinally, however, the concentrations of CSF biomarkers of neuronal injury/death within individuals decreased after their EAO, suggesting a slowing of acute neurodegenerative processes with symptomatic disease progression. These results emphasize the importance of longitudinal, within-person assessment when modeling biomarker trajectories across the course of the disease. If corroborated, this pattern may influence the definition of a positive neurodegenerative biomarker outcome in clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007901

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first biomarkers to become abnormal in carriers of deterministic AD mutations are those of Aβ.

    “The first biomarkers to become abnormal in carriers of deterministic AD mutations are those of Aβ [9–11,14].”

    From NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion proposes a sequence in which Aβ1-42 changes very early in mutation carriers, followed by increases in tau and other injury markers. But it presents this as a suggested model, not an established ordering of the first abnormal biomarkers. The Results also report elevated CSF ptau181 about 20 years before estimated symptom onset, while the Discussion says the apparent very-early CSF Aβ1-42 difference was not statistically established. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The imperfect correlation between tau PET and CSF P-tau may be in part because P-tau plateaus later in the disease while tau PET signal continues to increase.

    “This may be in part because P-tau seems to plateau later in the disease [14] while the tau PET signal continues to increase [124].”

    From NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results and Discussion report that CSF ptau181 rises early in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease but decreases at later, typically symptomatic stages. That supports the proposed change in trajectory, but the paper reports a significant later decline rather than a plateau. The tau PET comparison is attributed to a different citation and is not judged here; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Progression of biomarker measures in Alzheimer's disease is a continuous process that begins before symptoms.

    “and that progression of biomarker measures is also a continuous process that begins before symptoms [9–14]”
  • In DIAN, CSF tau rises about 15 years before expected symptoms, earlier than baseline CSF NfL rises.

    “In the DIAN cohort, the increase of tau in the CSF (absolute levels, cross-sectional) occurs as early as 15 years before the estimated age of symptom onset32, which is much earlier than the increase of base-line NfL in the CSF.”
  • CSF tau levels are higher in AD than in controls, but the levels decrease as the disease progresses despite the accrual of NFTs.

    “Although CSF tau levels are higher in AD than in controls, the levels decrease as the disease progresses, despite the accrual of NFTs56.”

    From Tau-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease (2018) · cites this paper as [56]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 434

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [13]Jagust W Landau S Shaw L Trojanowski J Koeppe R Reiman E Foster N Petersen R Weiner M Price J Mathis C Alzheimer’s Diseaase Neuroimaging Initiative, Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia Neurology 2009 73 1193 1199 19822868 PMC2764726
  2. [18]Lehmann M Koedam E Barnes J Bartlett J Barkhof F Wattjes M Schott J Scheltens P Fox N Alzheimer’s Diseaase Neuroimaging Initiative, Visual ratings of atrophy in MCI: Prediction of conversion and relationship with CSF biomarkers Neurobiol Aging 2013 34 73 82 22516280
  3. [60]Beckett L Harvey D Gamst A Donohue M Kornak J Zhang H Kuo J Alzheimer’s Diseaase Neuroimaging Initiative, The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Annual change in biomarkers and clinical outcomes Alzheimers Dement 2010 6 257 264 20451874 PMC2867839
  4. [62]Vemuri P Wiste H Weigand S Knopman D Trojanowski J Shaw L Bernstein M Aisen P Weiner M Petersen R Jack C Alzheimer’s Diseaase Neuroimaging Initiative, Serial MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal aging, MCI, and AD Neurology 2010 75 143 151 20625167 PMC2905929
  5. [67]Sunderland T Woolozin B Galasko D Levy J Dukoff R Bahro M Lasser R Motter R Lehtimaki T Seubert P Longitudinal stability of CSF tau levels in Alzheimer’s patients Biol Psychiatry 1999 46 750 755 10494442
  6. [72]Morris J Edland S Clark C Galasko D Koss E Mohs R VanBelle G Fillenbaum G Heyman A Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part IV. Rates of cognitive changes in the longitudinal assessment of Alzheimer’s disease Neurology 1993 43 2457 2465 8255439
  7. [75]Scheuner D Eckman C Jensen M Song X Citron M Suzuki N Bird T Hardy J Hutton M Kukull W Larson E Levy-Lahad E Viitanen M Peskind E Poorkaj P Schellenberg G Tanzi R Wasco W Lannfelt L Selkoe D Younkin S Secreted amyloid beta-protein similar to that in the senile plaques of Alzheimer’s disease is increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and 2 and APP mutations linked to familial Alzheimer’s disease Nature Med 1996 2 864 870 8705854
  8. [76]Jack C Vemuri P Wiste H Weigand S Aisen P Trojanowski J Shaw L Bernstein M Petersen R Weiner M Knopman D Alzheimer’s Diseaase Neuroimaging Initiative, Evidence for ordering of Alzheimer disease biomarkers Arch Neurol 2011 68 1526 1535 21825215 PMC3387980
  9. [81]Knight W Kim L Douiri A Frost C Rossor M Fox N Acceleration of cortical thinning in familial Alzheimer’s disease Neurobiol Aging 2011 32 1765 1773 20005601
  10. [84]Morris JC The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Current version and scoring rules Neurology 1993 43 2412 2414 8232972
  11. [85]Berg L McKeel DW Miller JP Storandt M Rubin EH Morris JC Baty J Coats M Norton J Goate AM Price JL Gearing M Mirra SS Saunders AM Clinicopathologic studies in cognitively healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease - Relation of histologic markers to dementia severity, age, sex, and apoE genotype Arch Neurol 1998 55 326 335 9520006
  12. [99]Mintun M LaRossa G Sheline Y Dence C Lee S-Y Mach R Klunk W Mathis C DeKosky S Morris J [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: Potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease Neurology 2006 67 446 452 16894106
  13. [102]Snijders T Bosker R Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling 1999 Sage Publications London
  14. [103]Hedeker D Handbook of Multilevel Analysis 2008 Springer New York

Authors
Fagan, A. M., Xiong, C., Jasielec, M. S., Bateman, R. J., Goate, A. M., Benzinger, T. L. S., Ghetti, B., Martins, R. N., Masters, C. L., Mayeux, R., Ringman, J. M., Rossor, M. N., Salloway, S., Schofield, P. R., Sperling, R. A., Marcus, D., Cairns, N. J., Buckles, V. D., Ladenson, J. H., Morris, J. C., Holtzman, D. M., & The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Mental Health Research Institute (AU)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Brown University (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Fagan, Anne M.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2014-03-05
Volume
6
Issue
226
Pages
226ra30-226ra30
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2096890121
Cited by
434
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 18
FWCI
26.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10033)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG016750, K24AG035007, P50-AG016750, U24 AG21886, UF1AG032438, P50AG005681, P01AG003991, P50AG005134, U19AG032438, U01AG032438, P01AG036694, P01AG026276, U24AG021886)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS057105, P30NS048056, P30NS098577)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR048335)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB009352)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024994)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, amyloid-beta 42, tau protein, phosphorylated tau 181, VILIP-1, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, age at symptom onset, longitudinal biomarker trajectories, amyloid imaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genes, Dominant, Homozygote, Humans, Immunoassay, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Peptide Fragments, Phosphorylation, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Disease Progression, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review