Cited by 134Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Breast-fed and bottle-fed infant rhesus macaques develop distinct gut microbiotas and immune systems

Open access
Ardeshir, Amir, Narayan, Nicole R., Méndez-Lagares, Gema, Lu, Ding, Rauch, Marcus, Huang, Yong, Van Rompay, Koen K. A., Lynch, Susan V. +1 more·2014·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Diet has a strong influence on the intestinal microbiota in both humans and animal models. It is well established that microbial colonization is required for normal development of the immune system and that specific microbial constituents prompt the differentiation or expansion of certain immune cell subsets. Nonetheless, it has been unclear how profoundly diet might shape the primate immune system or how durable the influence might be. We show that breast-fed and bottle-fed infant rhesus macaques develop markedly different immune systems, which remain different 6 months after weaning when the animals begin receiving identical diets. In particular, breast-fed infants develop robust populations of memory T cells as well as T helper 17 (TH17) cells within the memory pool, whereas bottle-fed infants do not. These findings may partly explain the variation in human susceptibility to conditions with an immune basis, as well as the variable protection against certain infectious diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008791

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breast-fed infant macaques had a significantly greater abundance of Prevotella spp. and arachidonic acid.

    “breast-fed infants had a significantly greater abundance of Prevotella spp. and arachidonic acid.”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Ardeshir et al., 2014

  • Human infants receiving greater amounts of arachidonic acid were at lower risk of contracting HIV from their HIV-positive mothers, and enhanced TH17 populations have been associated with reduced viral loads in simian immunodeficiency virus infection.

    “human infants receiving greater amounts of arachidonic acid were at lower risk of contracting HIV from their HIV+ mothers, and enhanced TH17 populations have been associated with reduced viral loads associated with infection from simian immunodeficiency virus (Ardeshir et al., 2014).”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Ardeshir et al., 2014

  • In infant rhesus macaques, breast-fed compared to formula-fed animals had greater microbiota community richness, evenness, and diversity, features positively correlated with TH1, cytotoxic T, and TH17 cells.

    “Community richness, evenness and diversity was greater in the microbiota of breast-fed compared to formula-fed animals, features that were positively correlated with TH1, cytotoxic T, and TH17 cells.”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Ardeshir et al., 2014

  • Prevotella spp. express phospholipase A2, which is able to release arachidonic acid from phospholipid membranes.

    “Prevotella spp. express phospholipase A2 which is able to release arachidonic acid from phospholipid membranes.”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Ardeshir et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 134

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [60]Lane DJ Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E Goodfellow M Wiley New York, NY 1991 115 148

Authors
Ardeshir, A., Narayan, N. R., Méndez-Lagares, G., Lu, D., Rauch, M., Huang, Y., Van Rompay, K. K. A., Lynch, S. V., & Hartigan-O’Connor, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ardeshir, Amir
  • Narayan, Nicole R.
  • Hartigan-O’Connor, Dennis J.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2014-09-03
Volume
6
Issue
252
Pages
252ra120-252ra120
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2149300436
Cited by
134
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P51OD011107)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI081540)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
breast milk, infant formula, rhesus monkeys, gut microbiota, infant immune development, memory T cells, Th17 cells, diet and immunity, microbial colonization, weaning
MeSH terms
Animals, Bottle Feeding, Breast Feeding, Diet, Humans, Immune System, Macaca mulatta, Arachidonic Acid, Principal Component Analysis, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metabolomics, Th17 Cells, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review