Cited by 95CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsRNA regulation and disease

Rescue of autosomal dominant hearing loss by in vivo delivery of mini dCas13X-derived RNA base editor

Xiao, Qingquan, Xu, Zhijiao, Xue, Yuanyuan, Xu, Chunlong, Han, Lei, Liu, Yuanhua, Wang, Fang, Zhang, Runze +6 more·2022·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Programmable RNA editing tools enable the reversible correction of mutant transcripts, reducing the potential risk associated with permanent genetic changes associated with the use of DNA editing tools. However, the potential of these RNA tools to treat disease remains unknown. Here, we evaluated RNA correction therapy with Cas13-based RNA base editors in the myosin VI p.C442Y heterozygous mutation ( Myo6 C442Y/+ ) mouse model that recapitulated the phenotypes of human dominant-inherited deafness. We first screened several variants of Cas13-based RNA base editors and guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting Myo6 C442Y in cultured cells and found that mini dCas13X.1-based adenosine base editor (mxABE), composed of truncated Cas13X.1 and the RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 2 deaminase domain variant (ADAR2dd E488Q ), exhibited both high efficiency of A > G conversion and low frequency of off-target edits. Single adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated delivery of mxABE in the cochlea corrected the mutated Myo6 C442Y to Myo6 WT allele in homozygous Myo6 C442Y/C442Y mice and resulted in increased Myo6 WT allele in the injected cochlea of Myo6 C442Y/+ mice. The treatment rescued auditory function, including auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emission up to 3 months after AAV-mxABE- Myo6 injection in Myo6 C442Y/+ mice. We also observed increased survival rate of hair cells and decreased degeneration of hair bundle morphology in the treated compare…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.abn0449

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 95

Authors
Xiao, Q., Xu, Z., Xue, Y., Xu, C., Han, L., Liu, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, R., Han, S., Wang, X., Li, G.-L., Li, H., Yang, H., & Shu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Shanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology (CN)
  • Huigene Therapeutics Inc., Shanghai 201315, China.
Corresponding author
  • Xiao, Qingquan
  • Xu, Zhijiao
  • Xue, Yuanyuan
  • Xu, Chunlong
  • Li, Huawei
  • Yang, Hui
  • Shu, Yilai
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2022-07-20
Volume
14
Issue
654
Pages
eabn0449-eabn0449
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W4286005717
Cited by
95
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 5
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
autosomal dominant hearing loss, RNA base editing, AAV gene therapy, myosin VI, hair cell survival, otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response, semidominant inheritance, guide RNA
MeSH terms
Animals, Deafness, Genes, Dominant, Hair Cells, Auditory, RNA, Hearing Loss, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review