The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The real structure of tobermorite 11A: normal and anomalous forms, OD character and polytypic modifications
Abstract
Specimens of tobermorite 11Å from Wessels mine, South Africa, an 'anomalous' tobermorite, and from Bašcenov, Urals, Russia, a 'normal' tobermorite, have been studied through X-ray diffraction. Their structural disorder, evidenced by the diffuseness of the reflections with k odd, has been dealt with through an OD approach, which allowed us to derive a reliable model of the structure, to define the two main polytypes (MDO structures), which were subsequently refined, revealing the distinctive structural details of the two specimens. The MDO1 polytype of tobermorite 11Å from Wessels mine [orthorhombic, space group F2dd, a = 11.265(2), b = 7.386(1), c = 44.970(9) Å] was refined to R = 0.128, whereas the refinement carried on the MDO2 polytype [monoclinic, space group B11m, a = 6.735(2), b = 7.385(1), c = 22.487(4) Å, Υ = 123.25(1)°] converged to R = 0.051. Two refinements were carried out for the MDO2 polytype of the specimen from the Urals [space group B11m, a = 6.732(2), b = 7.368(1), c = 22.680(4) Å, Υ = 123. 18(1)°] with data collected with conventional source (R = 0.089) and with synchrotron radiation (R = 0.110). Common structural features are the infinite layers of calcium polyhedra, parallel to (001), with tetrahedral chains of wollastonite-type running along b and attached on both sides of these layers. The composite layers are stacked along c and connected through formation of double tetrahedral chains, with 'ideal' composition [Si6O15(OH)2] and [Si6O16(OH)] in the specimens from Wessels mine and Urals respectively. The most distinctive feature of the two specimens is the content of the structural cavities: whereas only water molecules were found in the specimen from Wessels mine, 'zeolitic' calcium cations and water molecules were found in that from Urals. These structural aspects are compared and their relevance in explaining the different thermal behaviour of the two types of tobermorite 11Å is indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Richardson, I. G. (2004) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.034 · Cited by 1,082
Myers, R. J., Bernal, S. A., San Nicolas, R., & Provis, J. L. (2013) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la4000473 · Cited by 579
Carbonation of C–S–H and C–A–S–H samples studied by 13C, 27Al and 29Si MAS NMR spectroscopy
Sevelsted, T. F., & Skibsted, J. (2015) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.01.019 · Cited by 558
Andersen, M. D., Jakobsen, H. J., & Skibsted, J. (2003) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic020607b · Cited by 434
Andersen, M. D., Jakobsen, H. J., & Skibsted, J. (2006) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.04.010 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Merlino, S., Bonaccorsi, E., & Armbruster, T.
- Venue
- European Journal of Mineralogy
- Publisher
- Schweizerbart
- Published
- 2001-05-29
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 577-590
- ISSN
- 0935-1221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134792050
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The real structure of tobermorite 11A: normal and anomalous forms, OD character and polytypic modifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1127/0935-1221/2001/0013-0577
- The paper
- Merlino, S., Bonaccorsi, E., & Armbruster, T. (2001). The real structure of tobermorite 11A: normal and anomalous forms, OD character and polytypic modifications. European Journal of Mineralogy. https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2001/0013-0577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.