The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shocked and thermally metamorphosed zircon from the Vredefort impact structure, South Africa: a transmission electron microscopic study
Abstract
Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analysis of zircon crystals from a migmatitic pelitic granulite from the central part of the Vredefort Dome, the central uplift of the ca . 250–300 km diameter Vredefort impact structure in South Africa, reveals a nanometer- to micrometer-scale subplanar lamellar structure that is attributed to high-pressure (> 15 GPa) shock deformation during a 2.02 Ga mega-impact event. Two types of subplanar structures have been identified: (a) dislocation bands and (b) nm-scale lamellar features. The dislocation bands could represent the optically discernable planar features that have been described in naturally shocked zircon from a number of impact structures and Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary deposits. However, whether their nature is similar to that of planar deformation features (PDFs) known from other rock-forming minerals or whether they represent a form of shock-induced planar fracturing could not be determined. Annealing of these bands and localized formation of subgrains is consistent with the slow decay of shock heat from rocks beneath the very large (250–300 km diameter) Vredefort impact crater. The question of whether the nm-scale lamellar features represent an equivalent of the nm-scale PDFs identified previously in zircon could not be resolved. Following the shock event, amorphization (metamictization) has destroyed the zircon crystal structure in places.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“shock deformation of zircon (Kamo et al. 1996;Reimold et al. 2002)”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Reimold et al. 2002
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reimold, W. U., Leroux, H., & Gibson, R. L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Mineralogy
- Publisher
- Schweizerbart
- Published
- 2002-09-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 859-868
- ISSN
- 0935-1221
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review