Cold subduction of oceanic crust: Implications from a lawsonite eclogite from the Dominican Republic
Open accessAbstract
Lawsonite eclogite is a rare rock type that has been described from only five natural occurrences. In contrast, laboratory experiments and thermal models predict that lawsonite eclogite should be widespread in subducted oceanic crust deeper than 1.5 GPa. Here we report a new lawsonite eclogite find from the Dominican Republic that provides constraints on the conditions of subducted crust and on its return to the surface. In this sample, lawsonite coexisting with omphacite occurs as both inclusions in garnet and as porphyroblasts, the latter being partly replaced at their margins by epidote and zoisite. Peak pressure conditions estimated from lawsonite-phengite-omphacite-garnet assemblages were ca 1.6 GPa at a temperature of 360degreesC, implying formation under a geotherm of ca. 8degreesC/km. Peak temperature conditions of 410-450degreesC were in the zoisite eclogite field, suggesting that the sample crossed from the stability field of lawsonite eclogite into that of zoisite eclogite as a result of increasing temperature. A comparison with other reported occurrences indicates that most lawsonite eclogite exhumed at the Earth's surface formed in accretionary wedges. The rarity of lawsonite eclogite at the Earth's surface may be principally due to two factors: (i) that in 'normal' subduction settings lawsonite eclogite enters the subduction factory and hence is usually not exhumed; and (ii) that in accretionary wedge settings, where the PT path leaves the stability field of lawsonite eclogite due to heating, lawsonite eclogite is only preserved if the exhumation path is constrained to a narrow window where the terminal stability of lawsonite is not crossed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lawsonite paradox is explained by exceptional conditions (high free water at high pressure) necessary to form and preserve lawsonite during exhumation.
“Existing explanations for theuncommon occurrences of lawsonite-bearing lithologiesthe socalled the lawsonite paradoxrely on the exceptional conditions (i.e. a high amount of free water at high pressure) thought necessary to form and preserve lawsonite during exhumation (Zack et al., 2004;Clarke et al., 2006;Whitney and Davis, 2006;Tsujimori et al., 2006;Wei and Clarke, 2011).”
From Secular change and the onset of plate tectonics on Earth (2020) · cites this paper as Zack et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Zack, T., Rivers, T., Brumm, R., & Kronz, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Mineralogy
- Publisher
- Schweizerbart
- Published
- 2004-12-28
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 909-916
- ISSN
- 0935-1221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2354147047
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- European Journal of Mineralogy (publishedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
- Keywords
- lawsonite eclogite, cold subduction, oceanic crust subduction, exhumation, accretionary prism, omphacite, pressure-temperature conditions, garnet porphyroblasts, geotherms, Dominican Republic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review