Cited by 82Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies

Intercomparison of radiative forcing calculations of stratospheric water vapour and contrails

Myhre, Gunnar, Kvalevåg, Maria, Rädel, Gaby, Cook, Jolene, Shine, Keith P., Clark, Hannah, Karcher, Fernand, Markowicz, Krzysztof +8 more·2009·Meteorologische Zeitschrift

Abstract

Seven groups have participated in an intercomparison study of calculations of radiative forcing (RF) due to stratospheric water vapour (SWV) and contrails. A combination of detailed radiative transfer schemes and codes for global-scale calculations have been used, as well as a combination of idealized simulations and more realistic global-scale changes in stratospheric water vapour and contrails. Detailed line-by-line codes agree within about 15 % for longwave (LW) and shortwave (SW) RF, except in one case where the difference is 30 %. Since the LW and SW RF due to contrails and SWV changes are of opposite sign, the differences between the models seen in the individual LW and SW components can be either compensated or strengthened in the net RF, and thus in relative terms uncertainties are much larger for the net RF. Some of the models used for global-scale simulations of changes in SWV and contrails differ substantially in RF from the more detailed radiative transfer schemes. For the global-scale calculations we use a method of weighting the results to calculate a best estimate based on their performance compared to the more detailed radiative transfer schemes in the idealized simulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0411

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 82

Authors
Myhre, G., Kvalevåg, M., Rädel, G., Cook, J., Shine, K. P., Clark, H., Karcher, F., Markowicz, K., Kardas, A., Wolkenberg, P., Balkanski, Y., Ponater, M., Forster, P., Rap, A., Leon, R., & Rodriguez
Affiliations
  • CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO)
  • Laboratoire d'Aérologie (FR)
  • Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (FR)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
Venue
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Publisher
Schweizerbart
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
585-596
ISSN
0941-2948 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139227803
Cited by
82
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Meteorologische Zeitschrift (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G021694/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/E010164/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Keywords
radiative forcing, stratospheric water vapor, contrails, intercomparison, aviation climate impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review