The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phosphate mobilization in iron-rich anaerobic sediments: microbial Fe (III) oxide reduction versus iron-sulfide formation
Abstract
Mechanisms of phosphate (PO4 3- ) mobilization and retention were examined in iron-rich anaerobic freshwater wetland, lake, and coastal marine sediments. Direct microbial Fe(III) oxide reduction solubilized only 3-25% of initial solid-phase PO 4 3- during sulfate-free sediment incubation experiments. Experiments with reduced, non-sulfidic solid-phase Fe(II)-rich sediment demonstrated PO4 3- sorption by the solid-phase, and chemical equilibrium calculations indicated that conditions were favorable for precipitation of Fe(II)-P04 minerals [e.g. Fe 3 (PO 4 ) 2 ] in such sediments. These results suggested that much of the PO 4 3- released from Fe(III) oxides during microbial Fe(III) reduction was captured by solid-phase reduced iron compounds (Fe(II) hydroxide-PO4 complexes and/or Fe(II)-PO4 minerals). Enhanced liberation of PO 4 3- to sediment porewaters (33-100% of initial solid-phase PO 4 3- ) occurred during anaerobic incubation in the presence of abundant sulfate and was directly correlated with sulfate reduction and iron-sulfide mineral formation. Incubation of PO 4 3- -amended sediment with different amounts of sulfate demonstrated a linear correlation between PO 4 3- release and sulfate reduction. Release of PO 4 3- to sediment porewaters during decomposition of fresh organic matter (freeze-dried cyanobacteria) was more extensive in sulfate-amended (67% of added organic P) than in sulfate-free sediment (17% of added organic P), and the ratio of dissolved PO 4 3- released to organic carbon oxidized was seven-fold higher in sulfate-amended sediment despite a common level of overall organic C and P mineralization in the two treatments. Our results demonstrate that iron-rich anaerobic sediments can immobilize substantial amounts of PO 4 3- under Fe(III) oxide-reducing conditions, but that extensive PO 4 3- release will take place if sediment Fe compounds are converted to iron-sulfides via bacterial sulfate reduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herbert, E. R., Boon, P., Burgin, A. J., Neubauer, S. C., Franklin, R. B., Ardón, M., Hopfensperger, K. N., Lamers, L. P. M., & Gell, P. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es14-00534.1 · Cited by 980
Wilfert, P., Kumar, P. S., Korving, L., Witkamp, G.-J., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00150 · Cited by 607
Baldwin, D. S., & Mitchell, A. M. (2000) · Regulated Rivers: Research & Management · doi:10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<457::aid-rrr597>3.0.co;2-b · Cited by 560
Ocean productivity before about 1.9 Gyr ago limited by phosphorus adsorption onto iron oxides
Bjerrum, C. J., & Canfield, D. E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417159a · Cited by 468
Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in Australia
Nielsen, D. L., Brock, M. A., Rees, G. N., & Baldwin, D. S. (2003) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt02115 · Cited by 453
Metadata
- Authors
- Roden, E. E., & Edmonds, J. W.
- Venue
- Archiv für Hydrobiologie
- Publisher
- Schweizerbart
- Published
- 1997-06-06
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-378
- ISSN
- 0003-9136 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2496620919
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphate mobilization in iron-rich anaerobic sediments: microbial Fe (III) oxide reduction versus iron-sulfide formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/139/1997/347
- The paper
- Roden, E. E., & Edmonds, J. W. (1997). Phosphate mobilization in iron-rich anaerobic sediments: microbial Fe (III) oxide reduction versus iron-sulfide formation. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. https://doi.org/10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/139/1997/347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.