Cited by 44Geological and Geochemical AnalysisMineralogy and Gemology StudiesGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry

Oxygen isotope fractionation in wolframite

Zheng, Yong-Fei·1992·European Journal of Mineralogy

Abstract

Thermodynamic oxygen isotope factors for wolframite are calculated using the modified increment method and assuming a predominant contribution of the 18 O-increment in complex anion to the I- 18 O index of complex mineral. The oxygen isotope fractionation factors obtained between quartz, wolframite and water are : 10 3 ln α quartz-wolframite =0.38×10 6 /T 2 +4.76×10 3 /T-2.48, 10 3 ln α wolfr a mite-water =3.86×10 6 /T 2 -8.54×10 3 /T + 1.44 for the temperature range from 0 to 1200°C. No difference in fractionation between ferberite and huebnerite is observed, indicating that the substitution of Fe for Mn does not significantly affect the 18 O/ 16 O partitioning in the wolframite series. When the present calibration for the quartz-wolframite system is applied to isotopic geothermometry in hydrothermal tungsten mineralizations, the temperatures calculated are well comparable to results from other geothermometric methods

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1127/ejm/4/6/1331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxygen isotope inheritance in mineral formation by cation substitution has been supposed for the replacement of wolframite to scheelite in nature and apatite to BiPO4 in laboratory.

    “The oxygen isotope inheritance in mineral formation by cation substitution has been supposed for the replacement of wolframite to scheelite in nature (Zheng, 1992) and apatite to BiPO₄ in laboratory (Shemesh et al., 1988; Zheng, 1996).”

    From Oxygen isotope fractionation in carbonate and sulfate minerals. (1999) · cites this paper as Zheng, 1992

  • No adjustable parameters were introduced to the increment method after its establishment for calculations of oxygen isotope fractionation in different structures of crystalline minerals.

    “In addition, no adjustable parameters were introduced to the increment method after its establishment for calculations of oxygen isotope fractionation in the different structures of crystalline minerals (Zheng, 1991, 1992, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, Y.-F.
Corresponding author
Zheng, Yong-Fei
Venue
European Journal of Mineralogy
Publisher
Schweizerbart
Published
1992-12-15
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
1331-1336
ISSN
0935-1221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522289213
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Mineralogy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Keywords
oxygen isotope fractionation, wolframite, ferberite, geothermometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review