The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Importance of Monoterpenes in the Aggregation of the Spruce Bark Beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae: Ipinae)
Abstract
Field bioassays show that the aggregation of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Linnaeus 1758) to pheromone baited traps is affected by monoterpenes. The mixture of (-)-α-pinene and (+)-limonene attracts the adults significantly (2 ml of each compound per dispenser) whereas the individual components are ineffective. The application of (-)-β-myrcene reduces the trap catch to 33%. (+)-α-pinene acts as a repellent; only 6% of the trap catch of the control can be observed. The last-mentioned compound inhibits the colonization of trap trees by 1 typographus. Trap trees felled in winter can be devided in two groups with regard to the colonization by I typographus: (1) Uninfested trees are found to have only small amounts of monoterpenes in the inner bark which decrease only little in the interval between the date of felling and the dispersal of the beetles. (2) Trees which are colonized have higher concentrations of terpenes in the bast which are diminished significantly until I typographus initiated the brood systems. But the amounts of monoterpenes in the inner bark of colonized trap trees are higher compared to those which remain uninfested. I typographus is found to colonize parts of the stem which are characterized by an optimum concentration of the key monoterpene (-)-α-pinene ranging between 0.08 - 0.35 nmol/mg fresh matter. The density of brood systems correlates with an index value which is calculated from the concentrations of (-) and (+)-α-pinene, (+)-limonene, and (-)-β-myrcene.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“(+)-limonene in mixture with α -pinene attracted adults”
From Insecticidal, repellent, antimicrobial activity and phytotoxicity of essential oils: With special reference to limonene and its suitability for control of insect pests (2001) · cites this paper as Reddemann & Schopf 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
IBRAHIM, M. A., KAINULAINEN, P., & AFLATUNI, A. (2001) · Agricultural and Food Science · doi:10.23986/afsci.5697 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddemann, J., & Schopf, R.
- Venue
- Entomologia Generalis
- Publisher
- Schweizerbart
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 69-80
- ISSN
- 0171-8177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2467369211
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Entomologia Generalis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
- Keywords
- spruce bark beetle, monoterpenes, aggregation pheromone, α-pinene, limonene, myrcene, pheromone traps, repellent effect, tree colonization, inner bark, spruce
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review