Cited by 16Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyIsotope Analysis in EcologySoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Phospholipid fatty acid stable isotope probing techniques in microbial ecology

Open access
Maxfield, P. J., Evershed, R. P.·2014·Stable Isotope Probing and Related Technologies

Abstract

This chapter reviews the methodologies used to present stable isotopically labeled substrates to microbial communities present in a wide range of environmental materials, and also discusses the wet chemical and instrumental methods used to determine compound-specific δ13C values of individual phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA). The different ways in which the δ 13C values obtained can be used to assess a variety of properties and activities of microbial communities in the environment are discussed in this chapter. The most widely used labeling techniques for PLFA- stable isotope probing (SIP) utilize 13C-enriched gases as substrates. The PLFA-SIP approach significantly extends conventional PLFA profiling methods by identifying PLFAs diagnostic of specific functional groups through their enhanced 13C signatures derived from the assimilation of applied 13C-substrate(s). In this respect, the approach has key resonances with current trends in the way that environmental microbial communities are being considered in terms of the functioning and stability of ecosystems, especially in relation to the importance of ecosystem services in the context of sustainable environments. The relative ease of preparing PLFA fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), combined with the high sensitivity of the gas chromatography combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS) method, makes PLFA-SIP an extremely robust methodology, which allows very large numbers of environmental samples to be studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/9781555816896.ch3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stable isotope probing (SIP) of fatty acids allows tracing the utilization of a specific carbon substrate for growth by microorganisms.

    “This method allows tracing of the utilization of a specific (carbon) substrate for growth by (micro)organisms (Maxfield and Evershed, 2014;Wegener et al., 2016) and is frequently applied to unravel food web structures (Gilbert et al., 2020;Middelburg, 2014;Watzinger and Hood-Nowotny, 2019).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 16

Authors
Maxfield, P. J., & Evershed, R. P.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Stable Isotope Probing and Related Technologies
Publisher
ASM Press
Published
2014-04-30
Pages
37-71
OpenAlex
W73097489
Cited by
16
References
92
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • ASM Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/E018351/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
compound-specific carbon isotopes, microbial community function, fatty acid methyl esters, GC-C-IRMS, environmental microbial communities, ecosystem services, carbon assimilation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review