Phospholipid fatty acid stable isotope probing techniques in microbial ecology
Open accessAbstract
This chapter reviews the methodologies used to present stable isotopically labeled substrates to microbial communities present in a wide range of environmental materials, and also discusses the wet chemical and instrumental methods used to determine compound-specific δ13C values of individual phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA). The different ways in which the δ 13C values obtained can be used to assess a variety of properties and activities of microbial communities in the environment are discussed in this chapter. The most widely used labeling techniques for PLFA- stable isotope probing (SIP) utilize 13C-enriched gases as substrates. The PLFA-SIP approach significantly extends conventional PLFA profiling methods by identifying PLFAs diagnostic of specific functional groups through their enhanced 13C signatures derived from the assimilation of applied 13C-substrate(s). In this respect, the approach has key resonances with current trends in the way that environmental microbial communities are being considered in terms of the functioning and stability of ecosystems, especially in relation to the importance of ecosystem services in the context of sustainable environments. The relative ease of preparing PLFA fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), combined with the high sensitivity of the gas chromatography combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-C-IRMS) method, makes PLFA-SIP an extremely robust methodology, which allows very large numbers of environmental samples to be studied.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stable isotope probing (SIP) of fatty acids allows tracing the utilization of a specific carbon substrate for growth by microorganisms.
“This method allows tracing of the utilization of a specific (carbon) substrate for growth by (micro)organisms (Maxfield and Evershed, 2014;Wegener et al., 2016) and is frequently applied to unravel food web structures (Gilbert et al., 2020;Middelburg, 2014;Watzinger and Hood-Nowotny, 2019).”
From A stable isotope assay with 13C-labeled polyethylene to investigate plastic mineralization mediated by Rhodococcus ruber (2023) · cites this paper as Maxfield and Evershed, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Maxfield, P. J., & Evershed, R. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Venue
- Stable Isotope Probing and Related Technologies
- Publisher
- ASM Press
- Published
- 2014-04-30
- Pages
- 37-71
- OpenAlex
- W73097489
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- ASM Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/E018351/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- compound-specific carbon isotopes, microbial community function, fatty acid methyl esters, GC-C-IRMS, environmental microbial communities, ecosystem services, carbon assimilation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review