The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Susceptibility Test Methods: Dilution and Disk Diffusion Methods
Abstract
This chapter describes reference dilution (MIC) and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test methods for nonfastidious, aerobic bacteria. It describes CLSI (United States) and EUcst (European) reference methods and standardized disk diffusion methods. The procedure for performing each test type is described as well as quality control procedures. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. Finally, the most current interpretive breakpoint criteria for MIC and disk tests from the CLSI are listed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method
Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C., & Turck, M. (1966) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493 · Cited by 18,523
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically
Ferraro, M. J. (2000) · Cited by 16,875
International Organization for Standardization
(2015) · Encyclopedia of Astrobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44185-5_100574 · Cited by 6,716
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
(2019) · Springer Reference Medizin · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48986-4_300416 · Cited by 5,091
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations
Andrews, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5 · Cited by 4,129
Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-4-653_4 · Cited by 2,779
Carbapenemases: the Versatile β-Lactamases
Queenan, A. M., & Bush, K. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00001-07 · Cited by 2,499
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices
Jorgensen, J. H., & Ferraro, M. J. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/647952 · Cited by 1,894
Self-citationBaddour, L. M., Wilson, W. R., Bayer, A. S., Fowler, V. G., Bolger, A. F., Levison, M. E., Ferrieri, P., Gerber, M. A., Tani, L. Y., Gewitz, M. H., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.165564 · Cited by 1,707
Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.
Ericsson, H., & Sherris, J. C. (1971) · PubMed · Cited by 1,324
Cited by
Current and Emerging Methods of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Khan, Z. A., Siddiqui, M. F., & Park, S. (2019) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics9020049 · Cited by 442
Siddique, A., Azim, S., Ali, A., Adnan, F., Arif, M., Imran, M., Ganda, E., & Rahman, A. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11123435 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Jorgensen, J. H., & Turnidge, J. D.
- Venue
- Manual of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- ASM Press
- Published
- 2015-05-26
- Pages
- 1253-1273
- OpenAlex
- W1599817689
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 84.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Susceptibility Test Methods: Dilution and Disk Diffusion Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/9781555817381.ch71
- The paper
- Jorgensen, J. H., & Turnidge, J. D. (2015). Susceptibility Test Methods: Dilution and Disk Diffusion Methods. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555817381.ch71
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
