Cited by 119Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Superoxide dismutases are involved in Candida albicans biofilm persistence against miconazole

Open access
Bink, Anna, Vandenbosch, Davy, Coenye, Tom, Nelis, Hans, Cammue, Bruno P. A., Thevissen, Karin·2011·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

We investigated the cellular mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of miconazole-tolerant persisters in Candida albicans biofilms. Miconazole induced about 30% killing of sessile C. albicans cells at 75 μM. The fraction of miconazole-tolerant persisters, i.e., cells that can survive high doses of miconazole (0.6 to 2.4 mM), in these biofilms was 1 to 2%. Since miconazole induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) in sessile C. albicans cells, we focused on a role for superoxide dismutases (Sods) in persistence and found the expression of Sod-encoding genes in sessile C. albicans cells induced by miconazole compared to the expression levels in untreated sessile C. albicans cells. Moreover, addition of the superoxide dismutase inhibitor N , N ′-diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC) to C. albicans biofilms resulted in an 18-fold reduction of the miconazole-tolerant persister fraction and in increased endogenous ROS levels in these cells. Treatment of biofilms of C. albicans clinical isolates with DDC resulted in an 18-fold to more than 200-fold reduction of their miconazole-tolerant persister fraction. To further confirm the important role for Sods in C. albicans biofilm persistence, we used a Δ sod4 Δ sod5 mutant lacking Sods 4 and 5. Biofilms of the Δ sod4 Δ sod5 mutant contained at least 3-fold less of the miconazole-tolerant persisters and had increased ROS levels compared to biofilms of the isogenic wild type (WT). In conclusion, the occurrence of miconazole-tolerant persisters in C. albicans biofilms is linked to the ROS-detoxifying activity of Sods. Moreover, Sod inhibitors can be used to potentiate the activity of miconazole against C. albicans biofilms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.00280-11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Except for SOD2, all SOD genes were upregulated in miconazole-treated biofilms, with SOD5 upregulated most.

    “Except for SOD2, all SOD genes were upregulated in miconazole-treated biofilms, with SOD5 upregulated most.”

    From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

  • The Δsod4/Δsod5 double knockout mutant strain has increased ROS level and decreased persistence formation.

    “Significantly, the Δsod4/Δsod5 double knockout mutant strain has increased ROS level and decreased persistence formation.”

    From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

  • The persister fraction was reduced by 18-fold once cells were treated with the SOD inhibitor N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate.

    “Moreover, the persister fraction reduced by 18-fold once cells treated with a SOD inhibitor N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate [68].”

    From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

  • Formation of miconazole-tolerant C. albicans biofilm persisters is associated with the ROS detoxification activity of superoxide dismutases.

    “Bink et al. first found that formation of miconazole-tolerant C. albicans biofilm persisters was associated with the ROS detoxification activity of superoxide dismutases (SODs).”

    From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

  • DDC was previously reported to reduce levels of persister cells within miconazole-treated C. albicans biofilms.

    “Note that DDC was previously reported to also reduce the levels of persister cells within miconazole-treated C. albicans biofilms11.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 119

Authors
Bink, A., Vandenbosch, D., Coenye, T., Nelis, H., Cammue, B. P. A., & Thevissen, K.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Cammue, Bruno P. A.
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2011-09
Volume
55
Issue
9
Pages
4033-4037
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2140398671
Cited by
119
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
Candida albicans, biofilm, miconazole, antifungal drug tolerance, persister cells, superoxide dismutase, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate, antifungal susceptibility
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Ditiocarb, Fungal Proteins, Miconazole, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Superoxide Dismutase, Reactive Oxygen Species, Biofilms, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review