The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome of Vancomycin Treatment in Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Open accessAbstract
Limited data on the clinical outcome of vancomycin treatment compared with that of beta-lactam treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSA-B) are available. We used different and complementary approaches: (i) a retrospective cohort study using a propensity score to adjust for confounding by treatment assignment and (ii) a matched case-control study. Of all patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) in two university-affiliated hospitals over a 7-year period, 294 patients with MSSA-B were enrolled in the cohort study. The cases for the case-control study were defined as patients who received vancomycin treatment for MSSA-B; the controls, who were patients that received beta-lactam treatment for MSSA-B, were selected at a 1:2 (case:control) ratio according to the objective matching scoring system and the propensity score system. In the cohort study, SAB-related mortality in patients with vancomycin treatment (37%, 10/27) was significantly higher than that in those with beta-lactam treatment (18%, 47/267) (P= 0.02). In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that vancomycin treatment was associated with SAB-related mortality when independent predictors for SAB-related mortality and propensity score were considered (adjusted odds ratio of 3.3, 95% confidence interval of 1.2 to 9.5). In the case-control study using the objective matching scoring system and the propensity score system, SAB-related mortality in case patients was 37% (10/27) and in control patients 11% (6/54) (P< 0.01). Our data suggest that vancomycin is inferior to beta-lactam in the treatment of MSSA-B.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tong, S. Y. C., Davis, J. S., Eichenberger, E., Holland, T. L., & Fowler, V. G. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00134-14 · Cited by 5,192
Paul, M., Kariv, G., Goldberg, E., Raskin, M., Shaked, H., Hazzan, R., Samra, Z., Paghis, D., Bishara, J., & Leibovici, L. (2010) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkq373 · Cited by 224
Holmes, N. E., Turnidge, J. D., Munckhof, W. J., Robinson, J. O., Korman, T. M., O’Sullivan, M. V. N., Anderson, T. L., Roberts, S. A., Gao, W., Christiansen, K. J., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jir270 · Cited by 228
The Empirical Combination of Vancomycin and a -Lactam for Staphylococcal Bacteremia
McConeghy, K. W., Bleasdale, S. C., & Rodvold, K. A. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit560 · Cited by 90
Implementation of an infectious disease fellow-managed penicillin allergy skin testing service.
Heil, E. L., Bork, J. T., Schmalzle, S. A., Kleinberg, M., Kewalramani, A., Gilliam, B. L., & Buchwald, U. K. (2016) · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw155 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S.-H., Kim, K.-H., Kim, H.-B., Kim, N.-J., Kim, E.-C., Oh, M.-D., & Choe, K.-W.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 192-197
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2117744797
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of Vancomycin Treatment in Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.00700-07
- The paper
- Kim, S.-H., Kim, K.-H., Kim, H.-B., Kim, N.-J., Kim, E.-C., Oh, M.-D., & Choe, K.-W. (2008). Outcome of Vancomycin Treatment in Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00700-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.