Cited by 44Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statistical Methods for Establishing Quality Control Ranges for Antibacterial Agents in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Susceptibility Testing

Open access
Turnidge, John, Bordash, Gerry·2007·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Quality control (QC) ranges for antimicrobial agents against QC strains for both dilution and disk diffusion testing are currently set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), using data gathered in predefined structured multilaboratory studies, so-called tier 2 studies. The ranges are finally selected by the relevant CLSI subcommittee, based largely on visual inspection and a few simple rules. We have developed statistical methods for analyzing the data from tier 2 studies and applied them to QC strain-antimicrobial agent combinations from 178 dilution testing data sets and 48 disk diffusion data sets, including a method for identifying possible outlier data from individual laboratories. The methods are based on the fact that dilution testing MIC data were log normally distributed and disk diffusion zone diameter data were normally distributed. For dilution testing, compared to QC ranges actually set by CLSI, calculated ranges were identical in 68% of cases, narrower in 7% of cases, and wider in 14% of cases. For disk diffusion testing, calculated ranges were identical to CLSI ranges in 33% of cases, narrower in 8% of cases, and 1 to 2 mm wider in 58% of cases. Possible outliers were detected in 8% of diffusion test data but none of the disk diffusion data. Application of statistical techniques to the analysis of QC tier 2 data and the setting of QC ranges is relatively simple to perform on spreadsheets, and the output enhances the current CLSI methods for setting of QC ranges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.01457-06

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1093/jac/dki134 · DOI
  2. 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5804-5807.2005 · DOI
  3. 10.1128/jcm.14.1.67-72.1981 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1128/JCM.43.2.925-927.2005 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/jac/dki489 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/JCM.43.12.6136-6138.2005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Turnidge, J., & Bordash, G.
Affiliations
  • Women's and Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Microscan Systems (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Turnidge, John
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2007-07
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
2483-2488
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2127400909
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Microsoft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
antimicrobial susceptibility testing, CLSI guidelines, disk diffusion, broth dilution, minimum inhibitory concentration, zone diameter, outlier detection, lognormal distribution
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Quality Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review