Cited by 271Gut microbiota and healthMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Effect of Antibiotic Treatment on the Intestinal Metabolome

Open access
Antunes, L. Caetano M., Han, Jun, Ferreira, Rosana B. R., Lolić, Petra, Borchers, Christoph H., Finlay, B. Brett·2011·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The importance of the mammalian intestinal microbiota to human health has been intensely studied over the past few years. It is now clear that the interactions between human hosts and their associated microbial communities need to be characterized in molecular detail if we are to truly understand human physiology. Additionally, the study of such host-microbe interactions is likely to provide us with new strategies to manipulate these complex systems to maintain or restore homeostasis in order to prevent or cure pathological states. Here, we describe the use of high-throughput metabolomics to shed light on the interactions between the intestinal microbiota and the host. We show that antibiotic treatment disrupts intestinal homeostasis and has a profound impact on the intestinal metabolome, affecting the levels of over 87% of all metabolites detected. Many metabolic pathways that are critical for host physiology were affected, including bile acid, eicosanoid, and steroid hormone synthesis. Dissecting the molecular mechanisms involved in the impact of beneficial microbes on some of these pathways will be instrumental in understanding the interplay between the host and its complex resident microbiota and may aid in the design of new therapeutic strategies that target these interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.01664-10

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antibiotics represent the most direct and effective way of targeting the gut microbiota.

    “antibiotics represent the most direct and effective way of targeting the gut microbiota (Antunes et al., 2011;Jakobsson et al., 2010)”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Antunes et al., 2011

    The paper’s introductory text (page unavailable) says antibiotics have significant effects on the intestinal microbiota, supporting their use to perturb it. Neither that passage nor the Results passage comparing changes over time (page unavailable) establishes that antibiotics are the most direct and effective approach relative to other ways of targeting the microbiota. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 271

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]11. Leroy, Q., and D. Raoult. 2010. Review of microarray studies for hostintracellular pathogen interactions. J. Microbiol. Methods 81: 81-95.
  2. [26]26. Shimada, K., K. S. Bricknell, and S. M. Finegold. 1969. Deconjugation of bile acids by intestinal bacteria: review of literature and additional studies. J. Infect. Dis. 119: 73-81.
  3. [29]29. Thompson, L. J., et al. 2009. Transcriptional response in the peripheral blood of patients infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106: 22433-22438.

Authors
Antunes, L. C. M., Han, J., Ferreira, R. B. R., Lolić, P., Borchers, C. H., & Finlay, B. B.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Michael Smith Laboratories, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
Corresponding author
Finlay, B. Brett
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2011-04
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1494-1503
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2149529467
Cited by
271
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Genome Canada
  • Crohn's and Colitis Foundation
  • Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada
  • Genome British Columbia
  • University of British Columbia
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
antibiotic therapy, gut microbiota, intestinal metabolome, host-microbe interactions, intestinal homeostasis, bile acid synthesis, eicosanoid biosynthesis, steroidogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mass Spectrometry, Streptomycin, Eicosanoids, Mice, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review