Cited by 74Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal Infections and Studies

Fungal CYP51 Inhibitors VT-1161 and VT-1129 Exhibit Strong In Vitro Activity against Candida glabrata and C. krusei Isolates Clinically Resistant to Azole and Echinocandin Antifungal Compounds

Open access
Schell, W. A., Jones, A. M., Garvey, E. P., Hoekstra, W. J., Schotzinger, R. J., Alexander, B. D.·2017·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The in vitro activities of fungal CYP51 inhibitors VT-1161 and VT-1129 were determined for Candida glabrata ( n = 34) and C. krusei ( n = 50). C. glabrata isolates were screened for FKS gene mutations. All isolates were resistant clinically and/or in vitro to at least one standard antifungal compound. VT-1161 and VT-1129 MICs for all isolates were at least 5-fold below achievable human plasma levels for VT-1161. VT-1161 and VT-1129 are promising for the treatment of resistant C. glabrata and C. krusei infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.01817-16

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oteseconazole exhibited potent in vitro activity against most fluconazole-resistant C. albicans and C. krusei isolates (mean MIC ≤ 0.15 μg/mL) and echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata.

    “It exhibited potent in vitro activity against most fluconazole-resistant C. albicans and C. krusei isolates (mean MIC ≤ 0.15 μg/mL) as well as echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata [44, 49].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 74

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 3rd ed M27-A3 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  2. [12]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 4th informational supplement. M27-S4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]

Authors
Schell, W. A., Jones, A. M., Garvey, E. P., Hoekstra, W. J., Schotzinger, R. J., & Alexander, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Viamet Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2017-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2565813012
Cited by
74
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
CYP51 inhibitors, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, azole resistance, echinocandin resistance, antifungal resistance, in vitro antifungal activity, minimum inhibitory concentration
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Candida, Candidiasis, Fungal Proteins, Glucosyltransferases, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Pyridines, Tetrazoles, Gene Expression, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candida glabrata, Echinocandins, 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review