The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outer membrane permeability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of a wild-type with an antibiotic-supersusceptible mutant
Open accessAbstract
The Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant Z61 has been shown to be highly supersusceptible to a wide range of antibiotics, including beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, rifampin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol (W. Zimmerman, Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Biopharm. 17:131-134, 1979). Spontaneous revertants were isolated, using gentamicin or carbenicillin as selective agents, and shown to have two patterns of susceptibility to a group of 12 antibiotics. Partial revertants had 2- to 10-fold greater resistance to these antibiotics than mutant Z61, whereas full revertants had antibiotic susceptibilities indistinguishable from those of the wild-type strain K799, from which mutant Z61 had been derived. Uptake of a chromogenic beta-lactam nitrocefin was studied in both uninduced and induced cells of all strains by measuring the steady-state rate of nitrocefin hydrolysis by the inducible, periplasmic beta-lactamase in both whole and broken cells. This demonstrated that outer membrane permeability decreased as antibiotic resistance increased in the series mutant Z61, partial revertants, wild type, and full revertants. The data were consistent with the idea of low outer membrane permeability being caused by a low proportion of open functional porins in the outer membrane as the reason for the high natural antibiotic resistance of wild-type P, aeruginosa strains. In addition, it was observed that levels of benzylpenicillin below the minimal inhibitory concentration for mutant Z61 failed to induce beta-lactamase production. The possibility that this was related to the observed increase in outer membrane permeability is discussed. Preliminary evidence is presented that the pore-forming outer membrane porin protein F is not altered in mutant Z61.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited
Nikaido, H. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.4.593-656.2003 · Cited by 4,316
A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery
Stokes, J. M., Yang, K., Swanson, K., Jin, W., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Donghia, N. M., MacNair, C. R., French, S., Carfrae, L. A., Bloom-Ackermann, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021 · Cited by 2,463
Three Decades of β-Lactamase Inhibitors
Drawz, S. M., & Bonomo, R. A. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00037-09 · Cited by 1,709
Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria
Nikaido, H. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.20.5853-5859.1996 · Cited by 1,082
Antibiotic Resistance Caused by Gram‐Negative Multidrug Efflux Pumps
Nikaido, H. (1998) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514920 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Angus, B. L., Carey, A. M., Caron, D. A., Kropinski, A. M., & Hancock, R. E.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1982-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 299-309
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W1996779216
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outer membrane permeability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of a wild-type with an antibiotic-supersusceptible mutant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.21.2.299
- The paper
- Angus, B. L., Carey, A. M., Caron, D. A., Kropinski, A. M., & Hancock, R. E. (1982). Outer membrane permeability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of a wild-type with an antibiotic-supersusceptible mutant. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.21.2.299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.