The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
About 80% of methicillin- and cefazolin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically in Japan in 1982 retained their resistance even after elimination of penicillinase-encoding plasmids. The penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) of the penicillinase-free, methicillin- and cephem-resistant subclones of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared with those of spontaneous susceptible revertants which had been obtained by the replica method after 10 subcultures in drug-free media. A new PBP fraction (PBP2') having a molecular weight of 78,000 and low binding affinities for various beta-lactam antibiotics was found in MRSA exclusively. The levels of resistance of MRSA strains were reduced markedly by culturing them at 43 degrees C or at pH 5.2 or both. We found that the binding capacity of PBP2' for 14C-labeled penicillin G was decreased by preincubation of the membrane fractions of MRSA strains at 43 degrees C for 60 min and that the amount of PBP2' in MRSA strains grown at pH 5.2 was less than that the amount of PBP2' in MRSA strains grown at pH 7.0. Temperature- and pH-dependent expression of resistance in MRSA is likely to reflect the temperature sensitivity and neutral pH-dependent production of the specific PBP fraction (PBP2'). We suggest that MRSA strains can grow in the presence of beta-lactam antibiotics because of the low affinities of the specific PBP2' fraction for various beta-lactam antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology
Lakhundi, S., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00020-18 · Cited by 1,637
Kondo, Y., Ito, T., Ma, X. X., Watanabe, S., Kreiswirth, B. N., Etienne, J., & Hiramatsu, K. (2007) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00165-06 · Cited by 965
Ito, T., Katayama, Y., Asada, K., Mori, N., Tsutsumimoto, K., Tiensasitorn, C., & Hiramatsu, K. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.5.1323-1336.2001 · Cited by 963
García-Álvarez, L., Holden, M. T., Lindsay, H., Webb, C. R., Brown, D. F., Curran, M. D., Walpole, E., Brooks, K., Pickard, D. J., Teale, C., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70126-8 · Cited by 939
Bacterial Resistance to β-Lactam Antibiotics: Compelling Opportunism, Compelling Opportunity
Fisher, J. F., Meroueh, S. O., & Mobashery, S. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030102i · Cited by 913
Metadata
- Authors
- Utsui, Y., & Yokota, T.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397-403
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2050211738
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.28.3.397
- The paper
- Utsui, Y., & Yokota, T. (1985). Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.28.3.397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.