The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of an antibiotic produced by a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens inhibitory to Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and Pythium spp
Open accessAbstract
The production, isolation, and characterization of an antibiotic substance from cultures of Pseudomonas fluorescens 2-79 (NRRL B-15132) is described. P. fluorescens 2-79 originally was isolated from the roots of wheat and is suppressive to the wheat root disease take-all caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. The antibiotic was isolated from potato glucose broth cultures of strain 2-79 by solvent extraction. It was purified by silica gel column chromatography and was a greenish yellow, needle-shaped crystal with a melting point of 242 degrees C (decomposition). It was soluble in methylene chloride, chloroform, acetone, 2 N sodium hydroxide, and 2 N hydrochloric acid and was insoluble in water, methanol, ethyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, carbon tetrachloride, hexane, and petroleum ether. On the basis of UV, infrared, 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance, 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectral analysis, and elemental analysis, the structure of the antibiotic is proposed to be a dimer of phenazine carboxylic acid. Lithium aluminum hydride reduction of the antibiotic yielded hydroxymethyl phenazine as a major product which retained most of the biological characteristics of the parent molecule. There were no toxic symptoms when mice received this antibiotic by oral doses up to 464 mg/kg. The antibiotic showed excellent activity against several species of fungi, including the wheat pathogens Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, Rhizoctonia solani, and Pythium aristosporum; and it may have a role in suppression of take-all in vivo by strain 2-79.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. involved in suppression of plant root pathogens
O'Sullivan, D. J., & O'Gara, F. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.56.4.662-676.1992 · Cited by 663
Phenazine Compounds in Fluorescent Pseudomonas Spp. Biosynthesis and Regulation
Mavrodi, D. V., Blankenfeldt, W., & Thomashow, L. S. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.013106.145710 · Cited by 572
Role Of Antibiosis In The Biocontrol Of Plant Diseases
Fravel, D. (1988) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.26.1.75 · Cited by 565
Thomashow, L. S., Weller, D. M., Bonsall, R. F., & Pierson, L. S. (1990) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.56.4.908-912.1990 · Cited by 461
Self-citationMazzola, M., Cook, R. J., Thomashow, L. S., Weller, D. M., & Pierson, L. S. (1992) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.58.8.2616-2624.1992 · Cited by 395
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gurusiddaiah, S., Weller, D. M., Sarkar, A., & Cook, R. J.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 488-495
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2122035341
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of an antibiotic produced by a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens inhibitory to Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and Pythium spp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.29.3.488
- The paper
- Gurusiddaiah, S., Weller, D. M., Sarkar, A., & Cook, R. J. (1986). Characterization of an antibiotic produced by a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens inhibitory to Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and Pythium spp. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.29.3.488
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.