Cited by 81Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Comparison of in vivo activity of fluconazole with that of amphotericin B against Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, and Candida krusei

Open access
Fisher, M A, Shen, S H, Haddad, J, Tarry, W F·1989·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Fluconazole (UK-49,858) is a new oral bis-triazole antifungal agent with demonstrated activity against Candida albicans. Because of the increasing importance of infections due to other species of Candida, we studied the efficacy of fluconazole in a rat model of established systemic candidiasis, using clinical isolates of C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, and C. Krusei. In normal rats, oral fluconazole at both 20 and 80 mg/kg per day for 7 days reduced both kidney and liver titers of C. tropicalis and C. glabrata compared with those in control animals and was only slightly inferior to amphotericin B. Both fluconazole and amphotericin B were ineffective in reducing kidney titers of C. krusei, but amphotericin B was more effective than fluconazole in reducing liver titers. Fluconazole showed no increased efficacy at the higher dose of 80 mg/kg per day compared with 20 mg/kg per day in any experiment. These results suggest that oral fluconazole may be useful in the treatment of established disseminated candidiasis caused by species other than C. albicans. Further in vivo studies are needed, however, to define minimum effective doses and length of therapy and to test additional Candida isolates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.33.9.1443

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growing body of data suggests that a nontrivial proportion of the isolates of C. glabrata and C. krusei may be resistant to amphotericin B.

    “Third, a growing body of data suggests that a nontrivial proportion of the isolates of C. glabrata and C. krusei may be resistant to amphotericin B [4,11,[20][21][22].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 81

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. In E. H. Lennette, A. Balows, W. J. Hausler, Jr., and H. J. Shadomy (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

Authors
Fisher, M. A., Shen, S. H., Haddad, J., & Tarry, W. F.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
1989-09
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1443-1446
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W1993022796
Cited by
81
References
17
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Virginia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
fluconazole, amphotericin B, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, systemic candidiasis, antifungal activity, dose comparison, rat model
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Animals, Candida, Candidiasis, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Rats, Inbred Strains, Colony Count, Microbial, Fluconazole, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review