The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemical characterization of a beta-lactamase that hydrolyzes penems and carbapenems from two Serratia marcescens isolates
Open accessAbstract
Reexamination of Serratia marcescens isolates obtained in 1982 revealed two organisms that were resistant to the penem FCE 22101 (MIC, 512 micrograms/ml) and imipenem (MIC, 16 micrograms/ml) and that had slightly reduced susceptibilities to meropenem (MIC, 0.12 micrograms/ml). MICs of these agents for typical S. marcescens isolates were 1 to 8, 0.25 to 0.5, and 0.03 micrograms/ml, respectively. The two isolates were fully susceptible to broad-spectrum cephalosporins, and only one was highly resistant to ampicillin and carbenicillin (MICs, greater than 1,024 micrograms/ml). Both isolates had beta-lactamases that focused at pIs 8.2 and 9.7. The penicillin-resistant isolate additionally produced the TEM-1 enzyme. The enzymes with pIs of 8.2 and 9.7 were separated by cation-exchange chromatography. The pI 8.2 beta-lactamase was a class I enzyme of the type found in most S. marcescens isolates. It was almost inactive against carbapenems and penems, as was the class I enzyme from another S. marcescens strain. The pI 9.7 enzyme hydrolyzed penems and carbapenems rapidly: kcat (turnover number) values for FCE 22101, imipenem, and meropenem were 3.4, 26, and 1% of the kcat value for cephaloridine, respectively; kcat/Km values were 140, 915, and 150% of the kcat/Km value for cephaloridine, respectively. Otherwise, the pI 9.7 enzyme had predominantly penicillinase activity. It was inhibited more readily by clavulanate than by tazobactam and was inactivated by the chelating agents EDTA and ethylene glycol-bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid. Expression of the pI 9.7 enzyme was not associated with any plasmid, and production was not transferred to Escherichia coli K-12 recipients, even after the mobilizing plasmid pUZ8 was inserted into the S. marcecens donor strains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Three Decades of β-Lactamase Inhibitors
Drawz, S. M., & Bonomo, R. A. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00037-09 · Cited by 1,709
Metallo-β-Lactamases: the Quiet before the Storm?
Walsh, T. R., Toleman, M. A., Poirel, L., & Nordmann, P. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.2.306-325.2005 · Cited by 1,431
Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm!
Nordmann, P., Dortet, L., & Poirel, L. (2012) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2012.03.003 · Cited by 1,038
Epidemiology of β-Lactamase-Producing Pathogens
Bush, K., & Bradford, P. A. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00047-19 · Cited by 938
Past and Present Perspectives on β-Lactamases
Bush, K. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01076-18 · Cited by 832
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y. J., Wu, P. J., & Livermore, D. M.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 755-758
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W1983054660
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical characterization of a beta-lactamase that hydrolyzes penems and carbapenems from two Serratia marcescens isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.34.5.755
- The paper
- Yang, Y. J., Wu, P. J., & Livermore, D. M. (1990). Biochemical characterization of a beta-lactamase that hydrolyzes penems and carbapenems from two Serratia marcescens isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.34.5.755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.