The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of vancomycin for therapy of adult pneumococcal meningitis
Open accessAbstract
The emergence of pneumococci resistant to penicillin and other agents prompted us to evaluate intravenous vancomycin for the therapy of pneumococcal meningitis, which has an overall mortality of 30%. Eleven consecutive adult patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-culture-proven pneumococcal meningitis and positive initial CSF Gram stain were given intravenous vancomycin (usual dosage, 7.5 mg/kg every 6 h for 10 days). The MBCs of vancomycin ranged from 0.25 to 0.5 micrograms/ml. Early adjunctive therapy with intravenous dexamethasone, mannitol, and sodium phenytoin was also instituted. After 48 h of therapy, all 11 patients showed a satisfactory clinical response, although the CSF culture remained positive in one case; median trough CSF and serum vancomycin levels were 2 and 5.1 micrograms/ml, respectively, and trough CSF bactericidal titers ranged from less than 1:2 to 1:16. On day 3, one patient died of acute heart failure. Four patients had clinical failure at on days 4 (two patients), 7 (one), and 8 (one) of therapy; they all immediately responded to a change in antibiotic therapy. The remaining six patients were cured after 10 days of vancomycin therapy. At this point, median peak CSF and serum vancomycin levels were 1.9 and 18.5 micrograms/ml, respectively. A transient alteration of renal function occurred in two patients, and persistent slight hypoacusia occurred in three patients. In summary, 11 adults with pneumococcal meningitis were treated with vancomycin and early adjunctive therapy including dexamethasone. All patients initially improved, and 10 were ultimately cured of the infection. However, four patients experienced a therapeutic failure, which led to a change in vancomycin therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hao (2015) · doi:10.1002/14651858 · Cited by 11,321
Practice Guidelines for the Management of Bacterial Meningitis
Tunkel, A. R., Hartman, B. J., Kaplan, S. L., Kaufman, B. A., Roos, K. L., Scheld, W. M., & Whitley, R. J. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/425368 · Cited by 2,308
Corticosteroids for acute bacterial meningitis
Brouwer, M. C., McIntyre, P., Prasad, K., & van de Beek, D. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004405.pub5 · Cited by 809
Emergency diagnosis and treatment of adult meningitis
Fitch, M. T., & van de Beek, D. (2007) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70050-6 · Cited by 189
Acute Bacterial Meningitis in Infants and Children: Epidemiology and Management
Agrawal, S., & Nadel, S. (2011) · Pediatric Drugs · doi:10.2165/11593340-000000000-00000 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Viladrich, P. F., Gudiol, F., Liñares, J., Pallarés, R., Sabaté, I., Rufí, G., & Ariza, J.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2467-2472
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2001717618
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of vancomycin for therapy of adult pneumococcal meningitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.35.12.2467
- The paper
- Viladrich, P. F., Gudiol, F., Liñares, J., Pallarés, R., Sabaté, I., Rufí, G., & Ariza, J. (1991). Evaluation of vancomycin for therapy of adult pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.35.12.2467
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.