The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective observational study of Klebsiella bacteremia in 230 patients: outcome for antibiotic combinations versus monotherapy
Open accessAbstract
Combination antimicrobial agent therapy has been advocated for treatment of gram-negative bacteremia, including that caused by Klebsiella spp. We performed a prospective, observational, 10-hospital collaborative study to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic combination therapy versus that of monotherapy for 230 consecutive patients with Klebsiella bacteremia. The species involved were K. pneumoniae (82%), K. oxytoca (15%), and K. ozaenae (0.4%). Of the bacteremias, 26% were polymicrobial in nature. A total of 53% of cases were nosocomial infections. The most common portals were the urinary tract (28%), biliary tract (12%), lung (10%), and abdomen (9%). Some 49 and 51% of the patients had received monotherapy and antibiotic combination therapy (beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside), respectively; 14-day mortalities in the two groups were 20 and 18%, respectively. However, for the subgroup of patients who experienced hypotension within 72 h prior to or on the day of the positive blood culture, those patients who received combination therapy experienced significantly lower mortality (24%) than did those who received monotherapy (50%). We conclude that monotherapy with an antibiotic that is active in vitro against Klebsiella (beta-lactam or aminoglycoside) is sufficient therapy for less severely ill patients (immunocompetent, urinary tract portal, mentally alert, normal vital signs). On the other hand, for severely ill patients who experience hypotension, antibiotic combination therapy with a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside agent is preferred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dellit, T. H., Owens, R. C., McGowan, J. E., Gerding, D. N., Weinstein, R. A., Burke, J. P., Huskins, W. C., Paterson, D. L., Fishman, N. O., Carpenter, C. F., et al. (2007) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/510393 · Cited by 3,362
Self-citationCombination Therapy for Treatment of Infections with Gram-Negative Bacteria
Tamma, P. D., Cosgrove, S. E., & Maragakis, L. L. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05041-11 · Cited by 836
Paul, M., Benuri-Silbiger, I., Soares-Weiser, K., & Leibovici, L. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38028.520995.63 · Cited by 466
Safdar, N., Handelsman, J., & Maki, D. G. (2004) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(04)01108-9 · Cited by 417
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Korvick, J. A., Bryan, C. S., Farber, B., Beam, T. R., Schenfeld, L., Muder, R. R., Weinbaum, D., Lumish, R., Gerding, D. N., & Wagener, M. M.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2639-2644
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W1991811123
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective observational study of Klebsiella bacteremia in 230 patients: outcome for antibiotic combinations versus monotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.36.12.2639
- The paper
- Korvick, J. A., Bryan, C. S., Farber, B., Beam, T. R., Schenfeld, L., Muder, R. R., Weinbaum, D., Lumish, R., Gerding, D. N., & Wagener, M. M. (1992). Prospective observational study of Klebsiella bacteremia in 230 patients: outcome for antibiotic combinations versus monotherapy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.36.12.2639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.