The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for two distinct isoleucyl-tRNA synthetases
Open accessAbstract
Mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus results from changes in the target enzyme, isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IRS). Twelve strains of S. aureus comprising four susceptible (MICs < or = 4 micrograms/ml), four intermediate level-resistant (MICs between 8 and 256 micrograms/ml), and four highly resistant (MICs > or = 512 micrograms/ml) isolates were examined for their IRS content and the presence of a gene known to encode high-level mupirocin resistance. Ion-exchange chromatography of cell extracts showed a single IRS active peak in mupirocin-susceptible strains, with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) of 0.7 to 3.0 ng of mupirocin per ml. In strains showing intermediate mupirocin resistance, similar single IRS activity peaks were observed, but these were less sensitive to inhibition, and the mupirocin IC50s for them were 19 to 43 ng/ml. Strains that were highly resistant to mupirocin displayed two distinct peaks; one was similar to that found with susceptible strains (IC50, 0.9 to 2.5 ng/ml), but an additional peak with an IC50 of 7,000 to 10,000 ng/ml was also observed. A strain cured of the plasmid encoding high-level mupirocin resistance lacked the resistant IRS peak. Restriction digests, produced by endonuclease NcoI, of total bacterial DNA isolated from the highly resistant strains hybridized with a mupirocin resistance gene probe, whereas DNA isolated from the intermediate level-resistant and susceptible strains did not. These results demonstrate that two different IRS enzymes were present in highly mupirocin-resistant S. aureus strains. In strains expressing intermediate levels of resistance, only a chromosomally encoded IRS which was inhibited less by mupirocin than IRS from fully susceptible strains was detected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, K., Sparling, J., Chow, B. L., Elsayed, S., Hussain, Z., Church, D. L., Gregson, D. B., Louie, T., & Conly, J. M. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.11.4947-4955.2004 · Cited by 339
Wenzel, R. P., & Perl, T. M. (1995) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/0195-6701(95)90079-9 · Cited by 309
Eymann, C., Homuth, G., Scharf, C., & Hecker, M. (2002) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.184.9.2500-2520.2002 · Cited by 306
Biosynthesis of polyketides by trans-AT polyketide synthases
Piel, J. (2010) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b816430b · Cited by 304
Mobile genes in the human microbiome are structured from global to individual scales
Brito, I. L., Yilmaz, S., Huang, K., Xu, L., Jupiter, S. D., Jenkins, A. P., Naisilisili, W., Tamminen, M., Smillie, C. S., Wortman, J. R., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18927 · Cited by 288
“Some of the mobile genes are likely duplicated trans-acting core genes that confer antibiotic resistance, such tRNA synthetases 46,47,48,49 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbart, J., Perry, C. R., & Slocombe, B.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-38
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2096904100
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for two distinct isoleucyl-tRNA synthetases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.37.1.32
- The paper
- Gilbart, J., Perry, C. R., & Slocombe, B. (1993). High-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for two distinct isoleucyl-tRNA synthetases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.37.1.32
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.