The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline and gentamicin
Open accessAbstract
The objective of the present prospective, noncomparative, multicenter study was assess the safety and efficacy of gentamicin and doxycycline therapy for human brucellosis. In the first part of the study, a cohort of 17 patients received 100 mg of doxycycline (or 50 mg/kg of body weight per day if the body weight was < 40 kg) orally every 12 h for 45 days (cohort 1). In the second part of the study a subsequent cohort of 35 patients was treated with doxycycline at the same dosage for 30 days (cohort 2). All patients were treated intramuscularly with gentamicin at 240 mg (or 5 mg/kg per day if the body weight was < 50 kg) once daily for the first 7 days. Both cohorts showed a favorable response during therapy, and there were no therapeutic failures. Relapse was noted in 1 (5.9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.15 to 28.7%) of the 17 patients in cohort 1 and in 8 (22.9%; 95% CI, 10.4 to 40.1%) of the 35 patients in cohort 2. Nineteen patients (36.5%; 95% CI, 23.6 to 51.0%) had adverse effects, with no differences between cohorts, and no patients had a treatment-limiting adverse effect. The study indicates that the combination of doxycycline for 45 days and gentamicin for 7 days is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for human brucellosis. The relapse rates obtained with doxycycline treatment for 30 days appear to be higher than those obtained with doxycycline treatment for 45 days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S. D., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,668
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
An Overview of Human Brucellosis
Young, E. J. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/21.2.283 · Cited by 854
[Laboratory techniques in brucellosis].
OLITZKY, A. L. (1976) · PubMed · Cited by 643
Cited by
Brucellar Spondylitis: Review of 35 Cases and Literature Survey
Solera, J., Lozano, E., Martinez-Alfaro, E., Espinosa, A., Castillejos, M. L., & Abad, L. (1999) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/313524 · Cited by 294
Self-citation(2018) · PubMed · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Solera, J., Espinosa, A., Martínez-Alfaro, E., Sánchez, L., Geijo, P., Navarro, E., Escribano, J., & Fernández, J. A.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-84
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2101503666
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline and gentamicin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.41.1.80
- The paper
- Solera, J., Espinosa, A., Martínez-Alfaro, E., Sánchez, L., Geijo, P., Navarro, E., Escribano, J., & Fernández, J. A. (1997). Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline and gentamicin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.41.1.80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.