Cited by 210Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Molecular biological characterization of an azole-resistant Candida glabrata isolate

Open access
Marichal, P, Vanden Bossche, H, Odds, F C, Nobels, G, Warnock, D W, Timmerman, V, Van Broeckhoven, C, Fay, S +1 more·1997·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Two isolates of Candida glabrata, one susceptible and one resistant to azole antifungals, were previously shown to differ in quantity and activity of the cytochrome P-450 14alpha-lanosterol demethylase which is the target for azole antifungals. The resistant isolate also had a lower intracellular level of fluconazole, but not of ketoconazole or itraconazole, than the susceptible isolate. In the present study a 3.7-fold increase in the copy number of the CYP51 gene, encoding the 14alpha-lanosterol demethylase, was found. The amount of CYP51 mRNA transcript in the resistant isolate was eight times greater than it was in the susceptible isolate. Hybridization experiments on chromosomal blots indicated that this increase in copy number was due to duplication of the entire chromosome containing the CYP51 gene. The phenotypic instability of the resistant isolate was demonstrated genotypically: a gradual loss of the duplicated chromosome was seen in successive subcultures of the isolate in fluconazole-free medium and correlated with reversion to susceptibility. The greater abundance of the amplified chromosome induced pronounced differences in the protein patterns of the susceptible and revertant isolates versus that of the resistant isolate, as demonstrated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-GE). Densitometry of the 2D-GE product indicated upregulation of at least 25 proteins and downregulation of at least 76 proteins in the resistant isolate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.41.10.2229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 210

Authors
Marichal, P., Vanden Bossche, H., Odds, F. C., Nobels, G., Warnock, D. W., Timmerman, V, Van Broeckhoven, C., Fay, S., & Mose-Larsen, P.
Affiliations
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
  • Anti-Infectives Research Departments, Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium. pmaricha@janbe.jnj.com
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
1997-10
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
2229-2237
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W1510432475
Cited by
210
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida glabrata, azole resistance, fluconazole resistance, CYP51 gene, gene amplification, chromosome duplication, phenotypic instability, protein expression profiling, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Base Sequence, Candida, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Culture Media, DNA, Fungal, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Female, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Fungal, Humans, Middle Aged, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, RNA, Fungal, DNA Probes, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review