Characterization and quantitation of the pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis infection model
Open accessAbstract
We determined the pharmacodynamic parameter and the magnitude of that parameter that was predictive of the efficacy of fluconazole in the treatment of disseminated candidiasis. We used a neutropenic murine model of disseminated Candida albicans infection to characterize the time course of activity of fluconazole. Quantitation of colony counts in kidneys after 24 h of therapy with a wide range of doses and three dosing intervals was used to determine the dose required to achieve 50% of the maximal effect (ED 50 ). The ED 50 was similar for each of the dosing intervals studied, supporting the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) MIC ratio as the parameter that predicts the efficacy of fluconazole. Similar studies were performed with C. albicans strains for which fluconazole MICs are in the susceptible-dose-dependent range (MICs, 16 to 32 mg/liter). We found that the magnitude of the AUC/MIC ratio required to reach the ED 50 was similar for all three organisms studied, ranging from 12 to 25. When the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in humans are considered, these AUC/MIC ratios would support in vitro susceptibility breakpoints of 8 mg/liter for dosages of 200 mg/day and susceptibility breakpoints of 16 to 32 mg/liter for dosages of 400 to 800 mg/day.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observations from pharmacodynamic studies with fluconazole and voriconazole demonstrated time-dependent antifungal activity optimal at concentrations 1 to 2 times the MIC.
“Observations from these investigations demonstrated time-dependent antifungal activity that was optimal at concentrations 1 to 2 times the MIC.”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [136]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 192
- Authors
- Andes, D., & van Ogtrop, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- <!--label omitted: 2-->Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands2
- ORCID
- Andes, D.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2116-2120
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- PMC
- PMC89432
- OpenAlex
- W2107531307
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- fluconazole, pharmacodynamics, systemic candidiasis, Candida albicans, neutropenic mice, AUC/MIC ratio, ED50, dosing interval, antifungal susceptibility breakpoints
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Cyclophosphamide, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Immunosuppressive Agents, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Kidney, Mice, Inbred ICR, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Neutropenia, Colony Count, Microbial, Fluconazole, Area Under Curve, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review