Cited by 192Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFungal Infections and Studies

Characterization and quantitation of the pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis infection model

Open access
Andes, D., van Ogtrop, M.·1999·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

We determined the pharmacodynamic parameter and the magnitude of that parameter that was predictive of the efficacy of fluconazole in the treatment of disseminated candidiasis. We used a neutropenic murine model of disseminated Candida albicans infection to characterize the time course of activity of fluconazole. Quantitation of colony counts in kidneys after 24 h of therapy with a wide range of doses and three dosing intervals was used to determine the dose required to achieve 50% of the maximal effect (ED 50 ). The ED 50 was similar for each of the dosing intervals studied, supporting the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) MIC ratio as the parameter that predicts the efficacy of fluconazole. Similar studies were performed with C. albicans strains for which fluconazole MICs are in the susceptible-dose-dependent range (MICs, 16 to 32 mg/liter). We found that the magnitude of the AUC/MIC ratio required to reach the ED 50 was similar for all three organisms studied, ranging from 12 to 25. When the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in humans are considered, these AUC/MIC ratios would support in vitro susceptibility breakpoints of 8 mg/liter for dosages of 200 mg/day and susceptibility breakpoints of 16 to 32 mg/liter for dosages of 400 to 800 mg/day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.43.9.2116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observations from pharmacodynamic studies with fluconazole and voriconazole demonstrated time-dependent antifungal activity optimal at concentrations 1 to 2 times the MIC.

    “Observations from these investigations demonstrated time-dependent antifungal activity that was optimal at concentrations 1 to 2 times the MIC.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 192

Authors
Andes, D., & van Ogtrop, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • <!--label omitted: 2-->Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands2
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
1999-09
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
2116-2120
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2107531307
Cited by
192
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
fluconazole, pharmacodynamics, systemic candidiasis, Candida albicans, neutropenic mice, AUC/MIC ratio, ED50, dosing interval, antifungal susceptibility breakpoints
MeSH terms
Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Cyclophosphamide, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Immunosuppressive Agents, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Kidney, Mice, Inbred ICR, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Neutropenia, Colony Count, Microbial, Fluconazole, Area Under Curve, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review