Pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B in a neutropenic-mouse disseminated-candidiasis model
Open accessAbstract
In vivo pharmacodynamic parameters have been described for a variety of antibacterials. These parameters have been studied in correlation with in vivo outcomes in order to determine which dosing parameter is predictive of outcome and the magnitude of that parameter associated with efficacy. Very little is known about pharmacodynamics for antifungal agents. We utilized a neutropenic mouse model of disseminated candidiasis to correlate pharmacodynamic parameters (percent time above MIC [ T > MIC], area under the concentration time curve [AUC]/MIC ratio, and peak serum level/MIC ratio) for amphotericin B in vivo with efficacy, as measured by organism number in homogenized kidney cultures after 72 h of therapy. Amphotericin B was administered by the intraperitoneal route. Drug kinetics for amphotericin B in infected mice were nonlinear. Serum half-lives ranged from 13 to 27 h. Infection was achieved by intravenous inoculation with 10 6 CFU of yeast cells per ml via the lateral tail vein of neutropenic mice. Groups of mice were treated with fourfold escalating total doses of amphotericin B ranging from 0.08 to 20 mg/kg of body weight divided into 1, 3, or 6 doses over 72 h. Increasing doses produced concentration-dependent killing, ranging from 0 to 2 log 10 CFU/kidney compared to the organism number at the start of therapy. Amphotericin B also produced prolonged dose-dependent suppression of growth after serum levels had fallen below the MIC. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to determine which pharmacodynamic parameter best correlated with efficacy. Peak serum level in relation to the MIC (peak serum level/MIC ratio) was the parameter best predictive of outcome, while the AUC/MIC ratio and T > MIC were only slightly less predictive (peak serum level/MIC ratio, coefficient of determination [ R 2 ] = 90 to 93%; AUC/MIC ratio, R 2 = 49 to 69%; T > MIC, R 2 = 67 to 85%). The total amount of drug necessary to achieve various microbiological outcomes over the treatment period was 4.8- to 7.6-fold smaller when the dosing schedule called for large single doses than when the same amount of total drug was administered in 2 to 6 doses. Given the narrow therapeutic window of amphotericin B and frequent treatment failures, these results suggest the need for a reevaluation of current dosing regimens.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Amphotericin B binds or sequesters ergosterol-related lipids to exert its fungicidal activity.
“AMB binds or sequesters ergosterol-related lipids to exert its fungicidal activity46,47.”
From Candida auris skin tropism and antifungal resistance are mediated by carbonic anhydrase Nce103 (2025) · cites this paper as [46]
In vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies have observed increased killing of Candida species as amphotericin B concentration is escalated multiple times higher than the MIC.
“In vitro and in vivo PD studies have observed increased killing of Candida species as the concentration of amphotericin B is escalated multiple times higher than the MIC.”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [131]
The Cmax/MIC target associated with maximal efficacy for amphotericin B in experimental models is 2 to 4.
“The concentration relative to the MIC associated with maximal efficacy in experimental models is a C max /MIC of 2 to 4.”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [131]
Amphotericin B exposure results in prolonged growth inhibition (postantifungal effect).
“These models have also shown that growth inhibition after amphotericin B exposure continues for long periods of time.”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [131]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 180
- Authors
- Andes, D., Stamsted, T., & Conklin, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Andes, D.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 922-926
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- PMC
- PMC90394
- OpenAlex
- W2118189687
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- amphotericin B, pharmacodynamics, antifungal agents, systemic candidiasis, neutropenic mouse model, time above MIC, AUC/MIC ratio, dosing regimen, concentration-dependent killing, narrow therapeutic window, kidney fungal burden, dose optimization, intraperitoneal administration, antifungal dosing
- MeSH terms
- Amphotericin B, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Mice, Inbred ICR, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Neutropenia, Colony Count, Microbial, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review