The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism of Synergy between Epigallocatechin Gallate and β-Lactams against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
Compared to MICs (more than 800 μg/ml) of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg) against Escherchia coli , MICs of EGCg against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA) were 100 μg/ml or less. Furthermore, less than 25 μg EGCg per ml obviously reversed the high level resistance of MRSA to all types of tested β-lactams, including benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, methicillin, ampicillin, and cephalexin. EGCg also induced a supersusceptibility to β-lactams in MSSA which does not express mecA , encoding penicillin-binding protein 2′ (PBP2′). The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices of the tested β-lactams against 25 isolates of MRSA were from 0.126 to 0.625 in combination with 6.25, 12.5 or 25 μg of EGCg per ml. However, no synergism was observed between EGCg and ampicillin against E. coli . EGCg largely reduced the tolerance of MRSA and MSSA to high ionic strength and low osmotic pressure in their external atmosphere, indicating damage of the cell wall. Unlike dextran and lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan from S. aureus blocked both the antibacterial activity of EGCg and the synergism between EGCg and oxacillin, suggesting a direct binding of EGCg with peptidoglycan on the cell wall. EGCg showed a synergistic effect with dl -cycloserine (an inhibitor of cell wall synthesis unrelated to PBP2′) but additive or indifferent effect with inhibitors of protein and nuclear acid synthesis. EGCg did not suppress either PBP2′ mRNA expression or PBP2′ production, as confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR and a semiquantitative PBP2′ latex agglutination assay, indicating an irrelevance between the synergy and PBP2′ production. In summary, both EGCg and β-lactams directly or indirectly attack the same site, peptidoglycan on the cell wall. EGCg synergizes the activity of β-lactams against MRSA owing to interference with the integrity of the cell wall through direct binding to peptidoglycan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synergy research: approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticals.
Wagner, H., & Ulrich-Merzenich, G. (2009) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2008.12.018 · Cited by 1,296
Synergism between natural products and antibiotics against infectious diseases
Hemaiswarya, S., Kruthiventi, A. K., & Doble, M. (2008) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2008.06.008 · Cited by 916
Friedman, M. (2007) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200600173 · Cited by 641
Papuc, C., Goran, G. V., Predescu, C. N., Nicorescu, V., & Stefan, G. (2017) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12298 · Cited by 561
Antimicrobial properties of green tea catechins
Taylor, P. W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., & Stapleton, P. D. (2005) · Food Science <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Technology Bulletin: Functional Foods · doi:10.1616/1476-2137.14184 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, W.-H., Hu, Z.-Q., Okubo, S., Hara, Y., & Shimamura, T.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1737-1742
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2115590616
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of Synergy between Epigallocatechin Gallate and β-Lactams against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.45.6.1737-1742.2001
- The paper
- Zhao, W.-H., Hu, Z.-Q., Okubo, S., Hara, Y., & Shimamura, T. (2001). Mechanism of Synergy between Epigallocatechin Gallate and β-Lactams against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.45.6.1737-1742.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.