Cited by 288Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFungal and yeast genetics research

In Vitro Activity of Caspofungin against Candida albicans Biofilms

Open access
Bachmann, Stefano P., VandeWalle, Kacy, Ramage, Gordon, Patterson, Thomas F., Wickes, Brian L., Graybill, John R., López-Ribot, José L.·2002·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Most manifestations of candidiasis are associated with biofilm formation on biological or inanimate surfaces. Candida albicans biofilms are recalcitrant to treatment with conventional antifungal therapies. Here we report on the activity of caspofungin, a new semisynthetic echinocandin, against C. albicans biofilms. Caspofungin displayed potent in vitro activity against sessile C. albicans cells within biofilms, with MICs at which 50% of the sessile cells were inhibited well within the drug's therapeutic range. Scanning electron microscopy and confocal scanning laser microscopy were used to visualize the effects of caspofungin on preformed C. albicans biofilms, and the results indicated that caspofungin affected the cellular morphology and the metabolic status of cells within the biofilms. The coating of biomaterials with caspofungin had an inhibitory effect on subsequent biofilm development by C. albicans . Together these findings indicate that caspofungin displays potent activity against C. albicans biofilms in vitro and merits further investigation for the treatment of biofilm-associated infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.46.11.3591-3596.2002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early work in the late 1990s and early 2000s demonstrated potent antifungal activity of physiological concentrations of echinocandins against C. albicans biofilms, with subsequent studies extended to other Candida spp.

    “Early work in these academic laboratories in the late 1990s and early 2000s demonstrated the potent antifungal activity of physiological concentrations of echinocandins against C. albicans biofilms, with subsequent studies extended to other Candida spp [34,37,38].”
  • Cells in biofilms have been found to be more resistant to drugs compared with cells grown in suspension culture.

    “For example, a number of these biofilm formers (Table 3) have been tested for drug susceptibility in vitro, and cells in biofilms have been found to be more resistant to drugs compared with cells grown in suspension culture.”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

  • Members from Acremonium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, and Pneumocystis, in addition to Candida, are among the biofilm formers tested for drug susceptibility in vitro.

    “These include (in addition to Candida) members from Acremonium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, and Pneumocystis (9, 20, 35, 42, 79, 160, 176).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 288

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Hawser, S. 1996. Comparisons of the susceptibilities of planktonic and adherent Candida albicans to antifungal agents: a modified XTT tetrazolium assay using synchronised C. albicans cells. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 34:149-152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Bachmann, S. P., VandeWalle, K., Ramage, G., Patterson, T. F., Wickes, B. L., Graybill, J. R., & López-Ribot, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2002-11
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
3591-3596
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2034519764
Cited by
288
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (5 R01 DE11381, R01DE011381)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
caspofungin, Candida albicans, biofilm, echinocandins, candidiasis, antifungal susceptibility, cell morphology, biofilm-associated infections, biomaterial coatings, confocal laser scanning microscopy
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Candida albicans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Microscopy, Electron, Peptides, Peptides, Cyclic, Biofilms, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review