Cited by 975Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAntimicrobial agents and applicationsAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Mechanism of Action of Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) Oil on Staphylococcus aureus Determined by Time-Kill, Lysis, Leakage, and Salt Tolerance Assays and Electron Microscopy

Open access
Carson, Christine F., Mee, Brian J., Riley, Thomas V.·2002·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. The mechanisms of action of tea tree oil and three of its components, 1,8-cineole, terpinen-4-ol, and alpha-terpineol, against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 9144 were investigated. Treatment with these agents at their MICs and two times their MICs, particularly treatment with terpinen-4-ol and alpha-terpineol, reduced the viability of S. aureus. None of the agents caused lysis, as determined by measurement of the optical density at 620 nm, although cells became disproportionately sensitive to subsequent autolysis. Loss of 260-nm-absorbing material occurred after treatment with concentrations equivalent to the MIC, particularly after treatment with 1,8-cineole and alpha-terpineol. S. aureus organisms treated with tea tree oil or its components at the MIC or two times the MIC showed a significant loss of tolerance to NaCl. When the agents were tested at one-half the MIC, only 1,8-cineole significantly reduced the tolerance of S. aureus to NaCl. Electron microscopy of terpinen-4-ol-treated cells showed the formation of mesosomes and the loss of cytoplasmic contents. The predisposition to lysis, the loss of 260-nm-absorbing material, the loss of tolerance to NaCl, and the altered morphology seen by electron microscopy all suggest that tea tree oil and its components compromise the cytoplasmic membrane.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.46.6.1914-1920.2002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The antimicrobial activity of essential oils cannot be attributed to a single mechanism.

    “Because of the wide variety of molecules present in the natural extracts, the antimicrobial activity of the EOs cannot be attributed to a single mechanism.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [70]

  • Different biochemical and structural mechanisms are involved at multiple sites within the cell and on the cell surface.

    “Instead, different biochemical and structural mechanisms are involved [70] at multiple sites within the cell and on the cell surface.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [70]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 975

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]38. Windholz, M., S. Budavari, R. F. Blumetti, and E. S. Otterbein (ed.). 1983. The Merck index, 10th ed. Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, N.J.

Authors
Carson, C. F., Mee, B. J., & Riley, T. V.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Carson, Christine F.
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2002-06
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1914-1920
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2125266622
Cited by
975
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 62
FWCI
18.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
ACT Government
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
Melaleuca alternifolia, tea tree oil, Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial mechanisms, terpinen-4-ol, α-terpineol, 1,8-cineole, cytoplasmic membrane damage, autolysis, salt tolerance, bacterial lysis, mesosomes, plasma membrane integrity
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Cytoplasm, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Electrolytes, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Osmolar Concentration, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Staphylococcus aureus, Time Factors, Colony Count, Microbial, Tea Tree Oil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review