The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Posaconazole Administered in Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Adults
Open accessAbstract
The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of posaconazole, an investigational triazole antifungal, were evaluated following the administration of rising single and multiple oral doses. A total of 103 healthy adults were enrolled in two phase I trials. Each study had a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design with a rising single-dose (RSD) or rising multiple-dose (RMD) scheme. In the RSD study, subjects received single doses of posaconazole oral tablets (50 to 1,200 mg) or placebo. In the RMD study, subjects received posaconazole oral tablets (50 to 400 mg) or placebo twice daily for 14 days. By using model-independent methods, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and the maximum concentration in plasma were determined and used to assess dose proportionality. In the RSD study, the levels of posaconazole in plasma increased proportionally between the 50- and 800-mg dose range, with saturation of absorption occurring above 800 mg. Dose proportionality was also observed in the RMD study. In both studies, the apparent volume of distribution was large (range, 343 to 1,341 liters) and the terminal-phase half-life was long (range, 25 to 31 h). Posaconazole was well tolerated at all dose levels, and the adverse events were not dose dependent. No clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory test values or electrocardiograms were observed. Following the administration of single and twice-daily rising doses, the level of posaconazole exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner. The long elimination-phase half-life of posaconazole supports once- or twice-daily dosing in clinical trials; however, additional studies are required to determine if further division of the dose will enhance exposure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D., Benjamin, D. K., Calandra, T. F., Edwards, J. E., Filler, S. G., Fisher, J. F., Kullberg, B.-J., Zeichner, L. O., et al. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/596757 · Cited by 3,191
Oral Druggable Space beyond the Rule of 5: Insights from Drugs and Clinical Candidates
Doak, B. C., Over, B., Giordanetto, F., & Kihlberg, J. (2014) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.013 · Cited by 835
Aspergillus Infections in Transplant Recipients
Singh, N., & Paterson, D. L. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.1.44-69.2005 · Cited by 579
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Profile of Posaconazole
Li, Y., Theuretzbacher, U., Clancy, C. J., Nguyen, M. H., & Derendorf, H. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11319340-000000000-00000 · Cited by 450
Pharmacokinetics of antifungal drugs: practical implications for optimized treatment of patients
Bellmann, R., & Smuszkiewicz, P. (2017) · Infection · doi:10.1007/s15010-017-1042-z · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Courtney, R., Pai, S., Laughlin, M., Lim, J., & Batra, V.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2788-2795
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2097822381
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Posaconazole Administered in Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.47.9.2788-2795.2003
- The paper
- Courtney, R., Pai, S., Laughlin, M., Lim, J., & Batra, V. (2003). Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Posaconazole Administered in Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Adults. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.9.2788-2795.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.