The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics and Spatial Distribution of β-Lactamase Expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms
Open accessAbstract
The development of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is a problem in the treatment of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis. The main resistance mechanism is high-level expression of the chromosomally encoded AmpC β-lactamase of P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms. Several genes have been shown to influence the level of ampC expression, but little is known about the regulation of ampC expression in P. aeruginosa biofilms. To study the expression of ampC in P. aeruginosa biofilms, we constructed a reporter that consisted of the fusion of the ampC promoter to gfp (ASV) encoding an unstable version of the green fluorescent protein. In vitro biofilms of P. aeruginosa were exposed to the β-lactam antibiotics imipenem and ceftazidime. Sub-MICs of imipenem significantly induced the monitor system of the biofilm bacteria in the peripheries of the microcolonies, but the centers of the microcolonies remained uninduced. However, the centers of the microcolonies were physiologically active, as shown by experiments with another monitor construction consisting of an arabinose-inducible promoter fused to gfp (ASV). The whole biofilm was induced in the presence of increased imipenem concentrations. Ceftazidime induced the monitor system of the biofilm bacteria as well, but only bacteria in the peripheries of the microcolonies were induced in the presence of even very high concentrations. The experiments illustrate for the first time the dynamic and spatial distributions of β-lactamase induction in P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms. Thus, our experiments show that P. aeruginosa cells growing in biofilms constitute a heterogeneous population unit which may create different antibiotic-selective environments for the bacteria in the biofilm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms
Høiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Givskov, M., Molin, S., & Ciofu, O. (2010) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011 · Cited by 3,225
Self-citationPhysiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,327
The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections
Bjarnsholt, T. (2013) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/apm.12099 · Cited by 1,080
Ciofu, O., & Tolker-Nielsen, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00913 · Cited by 720
Self-citationPseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilms in Cystic fibrosis
H⊘iby, N., Ciofu, O., & Bjarnsholt, T. (2010) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.10.125 · Cited by 666
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagge, N., Hentzer, M., Andersen, J. B., Ciofu, O., Givskov, M., & Høiby, N.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1168-1174
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2150389007
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics and Spatial Distribution of β-Lactamase Expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.48.4.1168-1174.2004
- The paper
- Bagge, N., Hentzer, M., Andersen, J. B., Ciofu, O., Givskov, M., & Høiby, N. (2004). Dynamics and Spatial Distribution of β-Lactamase Expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.4.1168-1174.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.