In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Amphotericin B, Itraconazole, and Voriconazole against Aspergillus,Fusarium, and Scedosporium spp
Open accessAbstract
We compared the in vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus,Fusarium, and Scedosporium species with a combination of two non-culture-based techniques: the tetrazolium salt 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-[(sulfenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium-hydroxide) (XTT) colorimetric reduction assay, and fluorescent microscopy with the cellular morbidity dye bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol (DiBAC) to directly visualize hyphal damage. Amphotericin B exhibited species-specific concentration-dependent activity, with 50% effective concentrations (EC 50 s) ranging from 0.10 to 0.12 mg/ml for A. fumigatus, 0.36 to 0.53 mg/ml for A. terreus, 0.27 to ≥32 mg/ml for F. solani, 0.41 to 0.55 mg/ml for F. oxysporum, and 0.97 and 0.65 mg/ml for S. apiospermum and S. prolificans, respectively. Similarly, itraconazole inhibited the growth of A. fumigatus and A. terreus isolates with MICs of <1 mg/ml (EC 50 0.03 to 0.85 mg/ml) and S. apiospermum, but was not active against Fusarium species or S. prolificans. Voriconazole effectively inhibited the growth of Aspergillus,Fusarium, and S. apiospermum(EC 50 0.10 to 3.3 mg/ml) but had minimal activity against a multidrug-resistant isolate of F. solani or S. prolificans. Hyphal damage visualized by DiBAC staining was observed more frequently with voriconazole and amphotericin B versus itraconazole. These data highlight the species-specific differences in antifungal pharmacodynamics between mold-active agents that could be relevant for the development of in vitro susceptibility breakpoints and antifungal dosing in vivo.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies have observed increased killing of Candida species as amphotericin B concentration is escalated multiple times higher than the MIC.
“In vitro and in vivo PD studies have observed increased killing of Candida species as the concentration of amphotericin B is escalated multiple times higher than the MIC.”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [132]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Lewis, R. E., Wiederhold, N. P., & Klepser, M. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Ferris State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis, Russell E.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 945-951
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- PMC
- PMC549221
- OpenAlex
- W2137136000
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus terreus, Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Scedosporium apiospermum, Scedosporium prolificans, hyphal damage, antifungal susceptibility breakpoints, antifungal dosing, multidrug-resistant fungi
- MeSH terms
- Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus, Colorimetry, Fluorescence, Fusarium, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Pyrimidines, Species Specificity, Triazoles, Itraconazole, Scedosporium, Voriconazole
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review