Cited by 129Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal and yeast genetics research

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Amphotericin B, Itraconazole, and Voriconazole against Aspergillus,Fusarium, and Scedosporium spp

Open access
Lewis, Russell E., Wiederhold, Nathan P., Klepser, Michael E.·2005·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

We compared the in vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus,Fusarium, and Scedosporium species with a combination of two non-culture-based techniques: the tetrazolium salt 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-[(sulfenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium-hydroxide) (XTT) colorimetric reduction assay, and fluorescent microscopy with the cellular morbidity dye bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol (DiBAC) to directly visualize hyphal damage. Amphotericin B exhibited species-specific concentration-dependent activity, with 50% effective concentrations (EC 50 s) ranging from 0.10 to 0.12 mg/ml for A. fumigatus, 0.36 to 0.53 mg/ml for A. terreus, 0.27 to ≥32 mg/ml for F. solani, 0.41 to 0.55 mg/ml for F. oxysporum, and 0.97 and 0.65 mg/ml for S. apiospermum and S. prolificans, respectively. Similarly, itraconazole inhibited the growth of A. fumigatus and A. terreus isolates with MICs of <1 mg/ml (EC 50 0.03 to 0.85 mg/ml) and S. apiospermum, but was not active against Fusarium species or S. prolificans. Voriconazole effectively inhibited the growth of Aspergillus,Fusarium, and S. apiospermum(EC 50 0.10 to 3.3 mg/ml) but had minimal activity against a multidrug-resistant isolate of F. solani or S. prolificans. Hyphal damage visualized by DiBAC staining was observed more frequently with voriconazole and amphotericin B versus itraconazole. These data highlight the species-specific differences in antifungal pharmacodynamics between mold-active agents that could be relevant for the development of in vitro susceptibility breakpoints and antifungal dosing in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.49.3.945-951.2005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies have observed increased killing of Candida species as amphotericin B concentration is escalated multiple times higher than the MIC.

    “In vitro and in vivo PD studies have observed increased killing of Candida species as the concentration of amphotericin B is escalated multiple times higher than the MIC.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 129

Authors
Lewis, R. E., Wiederhold, N. P., & Klepser, M. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Ferris State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Russell E.
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2005-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
945-951
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2137136000
Cited by
129
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus terreus, Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Scedosporium apiospermum, Scedosporium prolificans, hyphal damage, antifungal susceptibility breakpoints, antifungal dosing, multidrug-resistant fungi
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus, Colorimetry, Fluorescence, Fusarium, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Pyrimidines, Species Specificity, Triazoles, Itraconazole, Scedosporium, Voriconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review