The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Should We Use N -Acetyltransferase Type 2 Genotyping To Personalize Isoniazid Doses?
Open accessAbstract
Isoniazid is metabolized by the genetically polymorphic arylamine N -acetyltransferase type 2 (NAT2). A greater number of high-activity alleles are related to increased acetylation capacity and in some reports to low efficacy and toxicity of isoniazid. The objective of this study was to assess individual isoniazid exposure based on NAT2 genotype to predict a personalized therapeutic dose. Isoniazid was administered to 18 healthy Caucasians (age 30 ± 6 years, body weight 74 ± 10 kg, five women) in random order as a 200-mg infusion, a 100-mg oral, and a 300-mg oral single dose. For the assessment of NAT2 genotype, common single nucleotide polymorphisms identifying 99.9% of variant alleles were characterized. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics and compartmental population pharmacokinetics were estimated from isoniazid plasma concentrations until 24 h postdose by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The influence of NAT2 genotype, drug formulation, body weight, and sex on dose-normalized isoniazid pharmacokinetics was assessed by analysis of variance from noncompartmental data and confirmed by population pharmacokinetics. Eight high-activity NAT2*4 alleles were identified. Sex had no effect; the other factors explained 93% of the variability in apparent isoniazid clearance (analysis of variance). NAT2 genotype alone accounted for 88% of variability. Individual isoniazid clearance could be predicted as clearance (liters/hour) = 10 + 9 × (number of NAT2*4 alleles). To achieve similar isoniazid exposure, current standard doses presumably appropriate for patients with one high-activity NAT2 allele may be decreased or increased by approximately 50% for patients with no or two such alleles, respectively. Prospective clinical trials are required to assess the merits of this approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice
Gardiner, S. J., & Begg, E. J. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.6 · Cited by 406
Hein, D. W., & Doll, M. A. (2012) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/pgs.11.122 · Cited by 121
Aklillu, E., Carrillo, J. A., Makonnen, E., Bertilsson, L., & Djordjevic, N. (2018) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-018-2448-y · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinzig-Schippers, M., Tomalik-Scharte, D., Jetter, A., Scheidel, B., Jakob, V., Rodamer, M., Cascorbi, I., Doroshyenko, O., Sörgel, F., & Fuhr, U.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1733-1738
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2135355814
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Should We Use N -Acetyltransferase Type 2 Genotyping To Personalize Isoniazid Doses? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.49.5.1733-1738.2005
- The paper
- Kinzig-Schippers, M., Tomalik-Scharte, D., Jetter, A., Scheidel, B., Jakob, V., Rodamer, M., Cascorbi, I., Doroshyenko, O., Sörgel, F., & Fuhr, U. (2005). Should We Use N -Acetyltransferase Type 2 Genotyping To Personalize Isoniazid Doses? Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.49.5.1733-1738.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.