Quorum Sensing in the Context of Food Microbiology
Open accessAbstract
Food spoilage may be defined as a process that renders a product undesirable or unacceptable for consumption and is the outcome of the biochemical activity of a microbial community that eventually dominates according to the prevailing ecological determinants. Although limited information are reported, this activity has been attributed to quorum sensing (QS). Consequently, the potential role of cell-to-cell communication in food spoilage and food safety should be more extensively elucidated. Such information would be helpful in designing approaches for manipulating these communication systems, thereby reducing or preventing, for instance, spoilage reactions or even controlling the expression of virulence factors. Due to the many reports in the literature on the fundamental features of QS, e.g., chemistry and definitions of QS compounds, in this minireview, we only allude to the types and chemistry of QS signaling molecules per se and to the (bioassay-based) methods of their detection and quantification, avoiding extensive documentation. Conversely, we attempt to provide insights into (i) the role of QS in food spoilage, (ii) the factors that may quench the activity of QS in foods and review the potential QS inhibitors that might “mislead” the bacterial coordination of spoilage activities and thus may be used as biopreservatives, and (iii) the future experimental approaches that need to be undertaken in order to explore the “gray” or “black” areas of QS, increase our understanding of how QS affects microbial behavior in foods, and assist in finding answers as to how we can exploit QS for the benefit of food preservation and food safety.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interaction with the surrounding environment can be crucial for defining cellular cooperation and the evolution of microbial communities.
“Even the interaction with the surrounding environment can be crucial for defining cellular cooperation and the evolution of microbial communities [16,17,18,19,20].”
From Microbiota of Cheese Ecosystems: A Perspective on Cheesemaking (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Microbial selection guides the food fermentation process and represents a crucial step that allows, starting from similar or identical matrices, for the development of even very different products.
“Microbial selection guides the food fermentation process and represents a crucial step that allows, starting from similar or identical matrices, for the development of even very different products [16,18,19,37,46,47,48,49,50].”
From Microbiota of Cheese Ecosystems: A Perspective on Cheesemaking (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
The food microbial ecology discussion (pp. 4–5) describes microbial succession and how food conditions and other species affect which organisms grow. It does not address microbial selection in fermentation or say that similar matrices can yield very different fermented products; searches for fermentation and starter cultures found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 142 · Cited by 215
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [118]118. Sperandio V, Torres AG, Jarvis B, Nataro JP, Kaper JB. 2003. Bacteriahost communication: the language of hormones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 :8951-8956.
- Authors
- Skandamis, P. N., & Nychas, G.-J. E.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-08-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5473-5482
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- PMC
- PMC3406170
- OpenAlex
- W2143784436
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 142
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EduLLL - Greek Educational Content Repository (EKT) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
- Keywords
- quorum sensing, food spoilage, QS inhibitors, biopreservatives, food preservation, food safety, cell-to-cell communication, virulence regulation
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Food Microbiology, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Quorum Sensing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review