The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Food and Food Products of Poultry Origin in Germany
Open accessAbstract
During a survey of fresh chicken and turkey meat as well as chicken and turkey meat products for the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in Germany, 32 (37.2%) of 86 samples were MRSA positive. Twenty-eight of these MRSA isolates belonged to clonal complex 398 (CC398), which is widespread among food-producing animals. These CC398 isolates carried SCC mec elements of type IV or V and exhibited spa type t011, t034, t899, t2346 or t6574 and either the known dru types dt2b, dt6j, dt10a, dt10q, dt11a, dt11v, and dt11ab or the novel dru types dt6m, dt10as, and dt10at. In addition, two MRSA sequence type 9 (ST9) isolates with a type IV SCC mec cassette, spa type t1430, and dru type dt10a as well as single MRSA ST5 and ST1791 isolates with a type III SCC mec cassette, spa type t002, and dru type dt9v were identified. All but two isolates were classified as multiresistant. A wide variety of resistance phenotypes and genotypes were detected. All isolates were negative for the major virulence factors, such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, or exfoliative toxins. In contrast to the MRSA CC398 isolates, the four ST9, ST5, or ST1791 isolates harbored the egc gene cluster for enterotoxin G, I, M, N, O, and U genes. Although the relevance of contamination of fresh poultry meat or poultry products with MRSA is currently unclear, the presence of multiresistant and, in part, enterotoxigenic MRSA emphasizes the need for further studies to elucidate possible health hazards for consumers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology
Lakhundi, S., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00020-18 · Cited by 1,637
Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat
Fitzgerald, J. R. (2012) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.01.006 · Cited by 302
Microbial quality and safety of milk and milk products in the 21st century
Fusco, V., Chieffi, D., Fanelli, F., Logrieco, A. F., Cho, G., Kabisch, J., Böhnlein, C., & Franz, C. M. A. P. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12568 · Cited by 266
Wang, X., Li, G., Xia, X., Yang, B., Xi, M., & Meng, J. (2014) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2013.1643 · Cited by 110
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Poultry and Poultry Meat: A Meta-Analysis
Ribeiro, C. M., Stefani, L. M., Lucheis, S. B., Okano, W., Cruz, J. C. M., Souza, G. V., Casagrande, T. A. C., Bastos, P. A. S., Pinheiro, R. R., Arruda, M. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-17-445 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Feßler, A. T., Kadlec, K., Hassel, M., Hauschild, T., Eidam, C., Ehricht, R., Monecke, S., & Schwarz, S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-10-15
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7151-7157
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2171786922
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Food and Food Products of Poultry Origin in Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00561-11
- The paper
- Feßler, A. T., Kadlec, K., Hassel, M., Hauschild, T., Eidam, C., Ehricht, R., Monecke, S., & Schwarz, S. (2011). Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Food and Food Products of Poultry Origin in Germany. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00561-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.