The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insects Represent a Link between Food Animal Farms and the Urban Environment for Antibiotic Resistance Traits
Open accessAbstract
Antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections result in higher patient mortality rates, prolonged hospitalizations, and increased health care costs. Extensive use of antibiotics as growth promoters in the animal industry represents great pressure for evolution and selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria on farms. Despite growing evidence showing that antibiotic use and bacterial resistance in food animals correlate with resistance in human pathogens, the proof for direct transmission of antibiotic resistance is difficult to provide. In this review, we make a case that insects commonly associated with food animals likely represent a direct and important link between animal farms and urban communities for antibiotic resistance traits. Houseflies and cockroaches have been shown to carry multidrug-resistant clonal lineages of bacteria identical to those found in animal manure. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated proliferation of bacteria and horizontal transfer of resistance genes in the insect digestive tract as well as transmission of resistant bacteria by insects to new substrates. We propose that insect management should be an integral part of pre- and postharvest food safety strategies to minimize spread of zoonotic pathogens and antibiotic resistance traits from animal farms. Furthermore, the insect link between the agricultural and urban environment presents an additional argument for adopting prudent use of antibiotics in the food animal industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resistance in bacteria of the food chain: Epidemiology and control strategies
Aarestrup, F. M., Wegener, H. C., & Collignon, P. (2008) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1586/14787210.6.5.733 · Cited by 406
Ready for a world without antibiotics? The Pensières Antibiotic Resistance Call to Action
Carlet, J., Jarlier, V., Harbarth, S., Voss, A., Goossens, H., Pittet, D., & Forum, T. P. O. T. 3. W. H.-A. I. (2012) · Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control · doi:10.1186/2047-2994-1-11 · Cited by 350
Spoor, L. E., McAdam, P. R., Weinert, L. A., Rambaut, A., Hasman, H., Aarestrup, F. M., Kearns, A. M., Larsen, A. R., Skov, R. L., & Fitzgerald, J. R. (2013) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00356-13 · Cited by 239
Bedbugs as Vectors for Drug-Resistant Bacteria
Lowe, C. F., & Romney, M. G. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1706.101978 · Cited by 52
Cited by
Design and regulation of engineered bacteria for environmental release
Chemla, Y., Sweeney, C. J., Wozniak, C. A., & Voigt, C. A. (2025) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01918-0 · Cited by 142
Indole: an evolutionarily conserved influencer of behavior across kingdoms
Tomberlin, J. K., Crippen, T. L., Wu, G., Griffin, A. S., Wood, T. K., & Kilner, R. M. (2017) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201600203 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Zurek, L., & Ghosh, A.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-06-15
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3562-3567
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2102975009
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insects Represent a Link between Food Animal Farms and the Urban Environment for Antibiotic Resistance Traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00600-14
- The paper
- Zurek, L., & Ghosh, A. (2014). Insects Represent a Link between Food Animal Farms and the Urban Environment for Antibiotic Resistance Traits. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00600-14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.