Methanogenic Population and CH 4 Production in Swedish Dairy Cows Fed Different Levels of Forage
Open accessAbstract
Methanogenic community structure, methane production (CH(4)), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles were investigated in Swedish dairy cows fed a diet with a forage/concentrate ratio of 500/500 or 900/100 g/kg of dry matter (DM) of total DM intake (DMI). The rumen methanogenic population was evaluated using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, 16S rRNA gene libraries, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Mean CH(4) yields did not differ (P > 0.05) between diets, being 16.9 and 20.2 g/kg DMI for the 500/500 and 900/100 diets, respectively. The T-RFLP analysis revealed that populations differed between individual cows and that each individual population responded differently to the diets. The 16S rRNA gene libraries revealed that Methanobrevibacter spp. dominated for both diets. CH(4) production was positively correlated with a dominance of sequences representing T-RFs related to Methanobrevibacter thaueri, Methanobrevibacter millerae, and Methanobrevibacter smithii relative to Methanobrevibacter ruminantium and Methanobrevibacter olleyae. Total numbers of methanogens and total numbers of Methanobacteriales were significantly higher with the 500/500 diet (P < 0.0004 and P < 0.002, respectively). However, no relationship was found between CH(4) production and total number of methanogens. No differences were seen in total VFA, propionic acid, or acetic acid contents, but the molar proportion of butyric acid in the rumen was higher for the 500…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The RO clade was found associated with low CH4 yield in the rumen.
“The RO clade was found associated with low CH4 yield in the rumen (Danielsson et al., 2012).”
From Comparative Analysis of the Microbiota Between Sheep Rumen and Rabbit Cecum Provides New Insight Into Their Differential Methane Production (2018) · cites this paper as Danielsson et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 108
- Authors
- Danielsson, R., Schnürer, A., Arthurson, V., & Bertilsson, J.
- Affiliations
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6172-6179
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- PMC
- PMC3416586
- OpenAlex
- W2045389880
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Stiftelsen Lantbruksforskning
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- methanogenic archaea, dairy cattle, forage to concentrate ratio, Methanobrevibacter, Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanobacteriales, volatile fatty acids, butyrate, rumen microbiota, individual cow variation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Archaea, Cattle, Diet, DNA, Ribosomal, Methane, Molecular Sequence Data, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Rumen, Sweden, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Biota, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review