Sporicidal Activity of Synthetic Antifungal Undecapeptides and Control of Penicillium Rot of Apples
Open accessAbstract
The antifungal activity of cecropin A(2-8)-melittin(6-9) hybrid undecapeptides, previously reported as active against plant pathogenic bacteria, was studied. A set of 15 sequences was screened in vitro against Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus niger, and Rhizopus stolonifer. Most compounds were highly active against F. oxysporum (MIC < 2.5 microM) but were less active against the other fungi. The best peptides were studied for their sporicidal activity and for Sytox green uptake in F. oxysporum microconidia. A significant inverse linear relationship was observed between survival and fluorescence, indicating membrane disruption. Next, we evaluated the in vitro activity against P. expansum of a 125-member peptide library with the general structure R-X(1)KLFKKILKX(10)L-NH(2), where X(1) and X(10) corresponded to amino acids with various degrees of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity and R included different N-terminal derivatizations. Fifteen sequences with MICs below 12.5 muM were identified. The most active compounds were BP21 {Ac,F,V} and BP34 {Ac,L,V} (MIC < 6.25 microM), where the braces denote R, X(1), and X(10) positions and where Ac is an acetyl group. The peptides had sporicidal activity against P. expansum conidia. Seven of these peptides were tested in vivo by evaluating their preventative effect of inhibition of P. expansum infection in apple fruits. The peptide Ts-FKLFKKILKVL-NH(2) (BP22), where Ts is a tosyl group, was the most active with an average efficacy of 56% disease reduction, which was slightly lower than that of a commercial formulation of the fungicide imazalil.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hybrid undecapeptide BP22 was active against P. expansum, the cause of blue mold on pome and stone fruits.
“or the hybrid undecapeptide BP22, which resulted active against P. expansum , the cause of blue mold on pome and stone fruits (Badosa et al., 2009).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Badosa et al., 2009
Cites
Identification and Rational Design of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides for Plant Protection
Marcos, J. F., Muñoz, A., Pérez-Payá, E., Misra, S., & López-García, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.121307.094843 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palou, L., Ali, A., Fallik, E., & Romanazzi, G. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.017 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Production of cecropin A antimicrobial peptide in rice seed endosperm
Bundó, M., Montesinos, L., Izquierdo, E., Campo, S., Mieulet, D., Guiderdoni, E., Rossignol, M., Badosa, E., Montesinos, E., San Segundo, B., et al. (2014) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-14-102 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationGarrigues, S., Gandía, M., Borics, A., Marx, F., Manzanares, P., & Marcos, J. F. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00592 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Badosa, E., Ferré, R., Francés, J., Bardají, E., Feliu, L., Planas, M., & Montesinos, E.
- Affiliations
- Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology-CIDSAV-XaRTA
- Universitat de Girona (ES)
- LIPPSO, Department of Chemistry, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, 17071 Girona, Spain
- Corresponding author
- Montesinos, Emilio
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5563-5569
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- PMC
- PMC2737905
- OpenAlex
- W2008940314
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Keywords
- undecapeptide, antifungal peptides, sporicidal activity, Penicillium expansum, apple fruit rot, Fusarium oxysporum, peptide library screening, microconidia, membrane damage, imazalil, plant disease control
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Cell Membrane, Melitten, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Organic Chemicals, Penicillium, Plant Diseases, Spores, Fungal, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides, Malus, Microbial Viability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review