Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of Soil Bacteria Susceptible to TiO 2 and ZnO Nanoparticles

Open access
Ge, Yuan, Schimel, Joshua P., Holden, Patricia A.·2012·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Because soil is expected to be a major sink for engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) released to the environment, the effects of ENPs on soil processes and the organisms that carry them out should be understood. DNA-based fingerprinting analyses have shown that ENPs alter soil bacterial communities, but specific taxon changes remain unknown. We used bar-coded pyrosequencing to explore the responses of diverse bacterial taxa to two widely used ENPs, nano-TiO 2 and nano-ZnO, at various doses (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg g −1 soil for TiO 2 ; 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 mg g −1 soil for ZnO) in incubated soil microcosms. These ENPs significantly altered the bacterial communities in a dose-dependent manner, with some taxa increasing as a proportion of the community, but more taxa decreasing, indicating that effects mostly reduced diversity. Some of the declining taxa are known to be associated with nitrogen fixation ( Rhizobiales , Bradyrhizobiaceae , and Bradyrhizobium ) and methane oxidation ( Methylobacteriaceae ), while some positively impacted taxa are known to be associated with the decomposition of recalcitrant organic pollutants ( Sphingomonadaceae ) and biopolymers including protein ( Streptomycetaceae and Streptomyces ), indicating potential consequences to ecosystem-scale processes. The latter was suggested by a positive correlation between protease activity and the relative abundance of Streptomycetaceae ( R = 0.49, P = 0.000) and Streptomyces ( R = 0.47, P = 0.000). Our results demonstrate that some metal oxide nanoparticles could affect soil bacterial communities and associated processes through effects on susceptible, narrow-function bacterial taxa.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.00941-12

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Ge, Y., Schimel, J. P., & Holden, P. A.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2012-09-15
Volume
78
Issue
18
Pages
6749-6758
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2116781551
Cited by
263
References
6
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Soil Bacteria Susceptible to TiO 2 and ZnO Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00941-12
The paper
Ge, Y., Schimel, J. P., & Holden, P. A. (2012). Identification of Soil Bacteria Susceptible to TiO 2 and ZnO Nanoparticles. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00941-12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.