Cited by 45Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchGut microbiota and healthDental Research and COVID-19

Effects of specimen collection methodologies and storage conditions on the short-term stability of oral microbiome taxonomy

Open access
Luo, Ting, Srinivasan, Usha, Ramadugu, Kirtana, Shedden, Kerby A., Neiswanger, Katherine, Trumble, Erika, Li, Jiean J., McNeil, Daniel W. +4 more·2016·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Community profiling of the oral microbiome requires the recovery of quality sequences in order to accurately describe microbial community structure and composition. Our objective was to assess the effects of specimen collection method, storage medium, and storage conditions on the relative abundance of taxa in saliva and plaque identified using 16S rRNA genes. We also assessed short-term changes in taxon composition and relative abundance and compared the salivary and dental plaque communities in children and adults. Over a 2-week period, four successive saliva and dental plaque specimens were collected from four adults with no dental decay (108 samples), and two successive specimens were collected from six children with four or more erupted teeth (48 samples). There were minimal differences in community composition at the phylum and operational taxonomic unit levels between dental plaque collection using a scaler and collection using a CytoSoft brush. Plaque samples stored in OMNIgene medium showed higher within-sample Shannon diversity, were compositionally different, and were more similar to each other than plaque stored in liquid dental transport medium. Saliva samples stored in OMNIgene recovered similar communities for at least a week following storage at room temperature. However, the microbial communities recovered from plaque and saliva stored in OMNIgene were significantly different in composition from their counterparts stored in liquid dental transport medium. Dental plaque communities collected from the same tooth type over four successive visits from the same adult did not significantly differ in structure or composition. IMPORTANCE: Large-scale epidemiologic studies require collection over time and space, often with multiple teams collecting, storing, and processing data. Therefore, it is essential to understand how sensitive study results are to modest changes in collection and storage protocols that may occur with variation in personnel, resources available at a study site, and shipping requirements. The research presented in this paper measures the effects of multiple storage parameters and collection methodologies on the measured ecology of the oral microbiome from healthy adults and children. These results will potentially enable investigators to conduct oral microbiome studies at maximal efficiency by guiding informed administrative decisions pertaining to the necessary field or clinical work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.01132-16

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 45

Authors
Luo, T., Srinivasan, U., Ramadugu, K., Shedden, K. A., Neiswanger, K., Trumble, E., Li, J. J., McNeil, D. W., Crout, R. J., Weyant, R. J., Marazita, M. L., & Foxman, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • West Virginia University (US)
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2016-09-15
Volume
82
Issue
18
Pages
5519-5529
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2470672650
Cited by
45
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01 DE014899)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
oral microbiota, saliva, dental plaque, specimen collection methods, sample storage conditions, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, microbial community stability
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Dental Plaque, DNA, Ribosomal, Humans, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Saliva, Specimen Handling, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review