The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Assessment of Nitrogen Fixation Methodologies, Conducted in the Oligotrophic North Pacific Ocean
Open accessAbstract
Resolution of the nitrogen (N) cycle in the marine environment requires an accurate assessment of dinitrogen (N 2 ) fixation. We present here an update on progress in conducting field measurements of acetylene reduction (AR) and 15 N 2 tracer assimilation in the oligotrophic North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (NPSG). The AR assay was conducted on discrete seawater samples using a headspace analysis system, followed by quantification of ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) with a reducing compound photodetector. The rates of C 2 H 4 production were measurable for nonconcentrated seawater samples after an incubation period of 3 to 4 h. The 15 N 2 tracer measurements compared the addition of 15 N 2 as a gas bubble and dissolved as 15 N 2 enriched seawater. On all sampling occasions and at all depths, a 2- to 6-fold increase in the rate of 15 N 2 assimilation was measured when 15 N 2 -enriched seawater was added to the seawater sample compared to the addition of 15 N 2 as a gas bubble. In addition, we show that the 15 N 2 -enriched seawater can be prepared prior to its use with no detectable loss (<1.7%) of dissolved 15 N 2 during 4 weeks of storage, facilitating its use in the field. The ratio of C 2 H 4 production to 15 N 2 assimilation varied from 7 to 27 when measured simultaneously in surface seawater samples. Collectively, the modifications to the AR assay and the 15 N 2 assimilation technique present opportunities for more accurate and high frequency measurements (e.g., diel scale) of N 2 fixation, providing further insight into the contribution of different groups of diazotrophs to the input of N in the global oceans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Deynze, A., Zamora, P., Delaux, P.-M., Heitmann, C., Jayaraman, D., Rajasekar, S., Graham, D., Maeda, J., Gibson, D., Schwartz, K. D., et al. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352 · Cited by 396
Nieves-Morión, M., Flores, E., Whitehouse, M. J., Thomen, A., & Foster, R. A. (2021) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01314-21 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, S. T., Böttjer, D., Church, M. J., & Karl, D. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-09-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 6516-6523
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2121950168
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Assessment of Nitrogen Fixation Methodologies, Conducted in the Oligotrophic North Pacific Ocean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.01146-12
- The paper
- Wilson, S. T., Böttjer, D., Church, M. J., & Karl, D. M. (2012). Comparative Assessment of Nitrogen Fixation Methodologies, Conducted in the Oligotrophic North Pacific Ocean. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01146-12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.