The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of Plant Functional Group, Plant Species, and Sampling Time on the Composition of nirK -Type Denitrifier Communities in Soil
Open accessAbstract
We studied the influence of eight nonleguminous grassland plant species belonging to two functional groups (grasses and forbs) on the composition of soil denitrifier communities in experimental microcosms over two consecutive years. Denitrifier community composition was analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) of PCR-amplified nirK gene fragments coding for the copper-containing nitrite reductase. The impact of experimental factors (plant functional group, plant species, sampling time, and interactions between them) on the structure of soil denitrifier communities (i.e., T-RFLP patterns) was analyzed by canonical correspondence analysis. While the functional group of a plant did not affect nirK -type denitrifier communities, plant species identity did influence their composition. This effect changed with sampling time, indicating community changes due to seasonal conditions and a development of the plants in the microcosms. Differences in total soil nitrogen and carbon, soil pH, and root biomass were observed at the end of the experiment. However, statistical analysis revealed that the plants affected the nirK -type denitrifier community composition directly, e.g., through root exudates. Assignment of abundant T-RFs to cloned nirK sequences from the soil and subsequent phylogenetic analysis indicated a dominance of yet-unknown nirK genotypes and of genes related to nirK from denitrifiers of the order Rhizobiales . In conclusion, individual species of nonleguminous plants directly influenced the composition of denitrifier communities in soil, but environmental conditions had additional significant effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes
Bardgett, R. D., Mommer, L., & De Vries, F. T. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.006 · Cited by 1,356
Saggar, S., Jha, N., Deslippe, J., Bolan, N. S., Luo, J., Giltrap, D. L., Kim, D.-G., Zaman, M., & Tillman, R. W. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.050 · Cited by 543
PGPR Mediated Alterations in Root Traits: Way Toward Sustainable Crop Production
Grover, M., Bodhankar, S., Sharma, A., Sharma, P., Singh, J., & Nain, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.618230 · Cited by 363
Ecology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying Microorganisms in Tropical Forest Soils
Pajares, S., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045 · Cited by 331
Bacterial gene abundances as indicators of greenhouse gas emission in soils
Morales, S. E., Cosart, T., & Holben, W. E. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.8 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Bremer, C., Braker, G., Matthies, D., Reuter, A., Engels, C., & Conrad, R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6876-6884
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1985847364
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Plant Functional Group, Plant Species, and Sampling Time on the Composition of nirK -Type Denitrifier Communities in Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.01536-07
- The paper
- Bremer, C., Braker, G., Matthies, D., Reuter, A., Engels, C., & Conrad, R. (2007). Impact of Plant Functional Group, Plant Species, and Sampling Time on the Composition of nirK -Type Denitrifier Communities in Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01536-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.