The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical Tweezers Cause Physiological Damage to Escherichia coli and Listeria Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the degree of physiological damage to bacterial cells caused by optical trapping using a 1,064-nm laser. The physiological condition of the cells was determined by their ability to maintain a pH gradient across the cell wall; healthy cells are able to maintain a pH gradient over the cell wall, whereas compromised cells are less efficient, thus giving rise to a diminished pH gradient. The pH gradient was measured by fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy by incorporating a pH-sensitive fluorescent probe, green fluorescent protein or 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester, inside the bacterial cells. We used the gram-negative species Escherichia coli and three gram-positive species, Listeria monocytogenes , Listeria innocua , and Bacillus subtilis . All cells exhibited some degree of physiological damage, but optically trapped E. coli and L. innocua cells and a subpopulation of L. monocytogenes cells, all grown with shaking, showed only a small decrease in pH gradient across the cell wall when trapped by 6 mW of laser power for 60 min. However, another subpopulation of Listeria monocytogenes cells exhibited signs of physiological damage even while trapped at 6 mW, as did B. subtilis cells. Increasing the laser power to 18 mW caused the pH gradient of both Listeria and E. coli cells to decrease within minutes. Moreover, both species of Listeria exhibited more-pronounced physiological damage when grown without shaking than was seen in cells grown with shaking, and the degree of damage is therefore also dependent on the growth conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Force production by single kinesin motors
Schnitzer, M. J., Visscher, K., & Block, S. M. (2000) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35036345 · Cited by 572
Cited by
Rotational manipulation of single cells and organisms using acoustic waves
Ahmed, D., Ozcelik, A., Bojanala, N., Nama, N., Upadhyay, A., Chen, Y., Hanna-Rose, W., & Huang, T. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11085 · Cited by 508
Righini, M., Ghenuche, P., Cherukulappurath, S., Myroshnychenko, V., García de Abajo, F. J., & Quidant, R. (2009) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl803677x · Cited by 344
Mok, J. H., Pyatkovskyy, T., Yousef, A., & Sastry, S. K. (2020) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107209 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasmussen, M. B., Oddershede, L. B., & Siegumfeldt, H.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-04-15
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2441-2446
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2166009034
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Tweezers Cause Physiological Damage to Escherichia coli and Listeria Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02265-07
- The paper
- Rasmussen, M. B., Oddershede, L. B., & Siegumfeldt, H. (2008). Optical Tweezers Cause Physiological Damage to Escherichia coli and Listeria Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02265-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.